Coleman, B., Bunch, J., Thoron, A., & Roberts, T. (2021). Examining the effects of reflection type and abstraction order on students’ scientific reasoning skills during experiential learning. Journal of Agricultural Education, 62(2), 13-26. http://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2021.02013
Experiential learning is a foundational element to agriscience education. The purpose of this study was
to examine the effects of reflection type and abstraction order on students’ scientific reasoning skills
when teaching experientially. Three major conclusions can be drawn from this study: (a) reflection
type and abstraction order are independent of one another; (b) reflection-on-action, regardless of
abstraction order, is more effective when developing students’ scientific reasoning skills; and (c) preabstraction
is more effective when developing students’ scientific reasoning skills regardless of
reflection type. It is recommended that future studies be replicated with a larger sample population,
provide a longer duration of treatment, and consider individual learning styles as they pertain to
reflection, abstraction, and other dependent variables not examined in this study. Regarding
recommendations for practice, it is recommended that professional development opportunities exist for
in-service teachers. The developers of professional development opportunities should focus on how to
better develop students’ scientific reasoning skills through experiential learning, reflection as a
teaching strategy, and designing learning experiences. Finally, the results of this study should be
shared with pre-service teachers in teaching methods and curriculum design courses to allow preservice
teachers to make informed decisions when designing learning experiences.
 62.2.2.pdf | [ ] | 392 kB |