Using Audience Segmentation to Identify Target Audiences for Climate-Smart Beef Production Communication

Authors

Keywords:

Climate-smart, audience segmentation, strategic communications, education

Abstract

In the face of increasing consumer scrutiny of the food supply chain, communication practitioners have been determined to understand public perceptions of the food production process from ‘farm to fork.’ The beef industry has been of particular interest due to the relatively high production emissions and an increased level of public support for environmentally friendly food behaviors, such as eating less beef. To address these concerns, the USDA and industry organizations are creating programs to incentivize and promote climate-smart beef production practices. Further, a new market is being created, where products may be labeled as ‘sustainable’ or ‘climate-smart.’ In order for this market to thrive, communicators and educators must strive to educate the public about these production practices; however, little is known about how to educate the public and market these climate-smart production techniques to the public. This study sought to identify and describe unique target audiences for educational communication about climate-smart beef production using audience segmentation. Through a K-means cluster analysis, we identified four strategic target audiences based on respondents’ climate change concern, political ideology, trust in science, and perception of the environmental responsibility of the beef industry. After, we described each cluster’s demographic characteristics, beef consumption frequency, attitude toward sustainable food products, and preferred communication sources to inform strategic communication efforts. This study provides insight and recommendations for educators and other practitioners communicating about climate-smart beef as well as areas of future research into this emergent area.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

References

Abrams, K. M., & Soukup, C. (2017). Matching local food messages to consumer motivators: An experiment comparing the effects of differently framed messages. Journal of Applied Communications, 101(4). http://dx.doi.org.lib-e2.lib.ttu.edu/10.4148/1051-0834.1297

American Society of Animal Science. (2015). Grand challenges. https://www.asas.org/docs/default-source/public-policy/gc_pages_web2015.pdf?sfvrsn=2

Arbuckle, M. B. (2016). The interaction of religion, political ideology, and concern about climate change in the United States. Society & Natural Resources, 30(2), 177-194. https://doi-org.lib-e2.lib.ttu.edu/10.1080/08941920.2016.1209267

Baker, R. J., Brick, M., Bates, N. A., Battaglia, M., Couper, M. P., Dever, J. A., & Gile, K. J. (2013). Summary report of the AAPOR task force on non-probability sampling. Journal of Survey Stastistics and Methodology, 1(2), 90-143. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smt008

Bonoma, T. V., & Shapiro, B. P. (1984). Evaluating market segmentation approaches. Industrial Marketing Management, 13(4), 257-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-8501(84)90021-X

Bostrom, A., Böhm, G., & O'Connor, R. E. (2013). Targeting and tailoring climate change communications. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4(5), 447-455. https://doi-org.lib-e2.lib.ttu.edu/10.1002/wcc.234

Bouman, T., Verschoor, M., Albers, C. J., Böhm, G., Fisher, S. D., Poortinga, W., & Steg, L. (2020). When worry about climate change leads to climate action: How values, worry and personal responsibility relate to various climate actions. Global Environmental Change, 62. https://doi-org.lib-e2.lib.ttu.edu/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102061

Burnier, P.C., Guerra, D.S., &Spers, E.E. (2021). Measuring consumer perceptions over beef good practices and sustainable production process, British Food Journal, 123(4), 1362-1383. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-12-2019-0904

Chinn, S., & Hart, P. S. (2021). Climate change consensus messages cause reactance. Environmental Communication, 1-9. https://doi-org.lib-

Cologna, V., & Siegrist, M. (2020). The role of trust for climate change mitigation and adaptation behaviour: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 69, 101428. https://doi-org.lib-e2.lib.ttu.edu/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101428

Cusworth, G., Lorimer, J., Brice, J., & Garnett, T. (2022). Green rebranding: Regenerative agriculture, future‐pasts, and the naturalisation of livestock. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 47(4), 1009-1027. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12555

de Leon, R. P., Wingrove, S., & Kay, A. C. (2020). Scientific skepticism and inequality: Political and ideological roots. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 91, 104045. https://doi-org.lib-e2.lib.ttu.edu/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104045

de Souza, M., Petre, R., Jackson, F., Hadarits, M., Pogue, S., Carlyle, C., Bork, E., & McAllister, T. (2017). A review of sustainability enhancements in the beef value chain: State-of-the-art and recommendations for future improvements. Animals, 7(12), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7030026

Detenber, B., Rosenthal, S., Liao, Y., & Ho, S. S. (2016). Climate and sustainability| audience segmentation for campaign design: Addressing climate change in Singapore. International Journal of Communication, 10, 23. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4696

Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. John Wiley & Sons.

Dietz, T., Dan, A., & Shwom, R. (2007). Support for climate change policy: Social psychological and social structural influences. Rural sociology, 72(2), 185-214. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1526/003601107781170026

Donsbach, W., & Traugott, M. W. (Eds.). (2007). The SAGE handbook of public opinion research. Sage.

Essary, C., Fischer, L. M., & Irlbeck, E. (2021). A statistical approach to classification: A guide to hierarchical cluster analysis in agricultural communications research, Journal of Applied Communications, 87(3). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2431

Estes, S., Edgar, L. D., & Johnson, D. M. (2015). Consumer perceptions of poultry production: A focus on Arkansas, Journal of Applied Communications, 99(4). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.1057

Everitt, B. S., Landau, S., Leese, M., & Stahl, D. (2011). Cluster Analysis. John Wiley & Sons.

Fischer, L. M., Schroeder, E., Gibson, C., McCord, A., & Orton, G. (2023). An experimental study investigating the effects of data visualizations used in infographics on participant recall and information recognition. Journal of Applied Communications, 107(3), https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2489

Fischer, L. M, Cummins, R. G., Gilliam, K. C., Baker, M., Burris, S., & Irlbeck, E. (2018). Examining the critical moments in information processing of water conservation videos within young farmers and ranchers: A psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Agricultural Education, 59(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2018.02001

Fischer, L., Meyers, C., Cummins, R. G., Gibson, C., & Baker, M. (2020). Creating relevancy in scientific information: An analysis of the impact of motivational salience and involvement on visual attention. Journal of Applied Communications, 104(2), https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2287

Frey, S., Bar Am, J., Doshi, V., Malik, A., & Noble, S. (2023). Consumers care about sustainability-and back it up with their wallets. https://nielseniq.com/global/en/insights/report/2023/consumers-care-about-sustainability-and-back-it-up-with-their-wallets/

Gosnell, H., Emard, K., & Hyde, E. (2021). Taking stock of social sustainability and the US beef industry. Sustainability, 13(21), 11860. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111860

Gromet, D. M., Kunreuther, H., & Larrick, R. P. (2013). Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices. PNAS, 110(23), 9314-9319. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218453110

Grunig, J. (1989). Publics, audiences, and market segments: Segmentation principles for

campaigns. In C. Salmon (Ed.), Information campaigns: Balancing social values and social change, (p. 199–228). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Happer, C., Wellesley, L. (2019). Meat consumption, behaviour and the media environment: A focus group analysis across four countries. Food Security, 11, 123–139. https://doi-org.lib-e2.lib.ttu.edu/10.1007/s12571-018-0877-1

Hine, D. W., Reser, J. P., Morrison, M., Phillips, W. J., Nunn, P., & Cooksey, R. (2014). Audience segmentation and climate change communication: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(4), 441-459. https://wires-onlinelibrary-wiley-com.lib-e2.lib.ttu.edu/doi/pdf/10.1002/wcc.279

Huang, P., Lamm, A. J., & Dukes, M. D. (2016). Informing extension program development through audience segmentation: Targeting high water users. Journal of Agricultural Education, 57(2), 60-74. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2016.02060

KTVZ News Staff. (2022, November 13). 100+ Western ranchers launch major effort to raise climate-smart beef. East Idaho News. https://www.eastidahonews.com/2022/11/100-western-ranchers-launch-major-effort-to-raise-climate-smart-beef/

Lamm, A. J., & Lamm, K. W. (2019). Using non-probability sampling methods in agricultural and extension education research. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 26(1), 52-59. https://web.archive.org/web/20201127042955id_/https://www.aiaee.org/attachments/article/1742/7%20Non-Probability%20Sampling%20Methods%20in%20Ag_Lamm.pdf

Lehdonvirta, V., Oksanen, A., Räsänen, P., & Blank, G. (2021), Social media, web, and panel surveys: Using non-probability samples in social and policy research. Policy & Internet, 13, 134-155. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.238

Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2009). Global warming's six Americas 2009: An audience segmentation analysis. https://trid.trb.org/view/889822

McCright, A. M. (2009). The social bases of climate change knowledge, concern, and policy support in the U.S. general public. Hofstra Law Review, 37(4), 1017-1048. https://heinonline-org.law-ezp.law.ttu.edu/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hoflr37&div=38&id=&page=&collection=journals

McCright, A. M., Marquart-Pyatt, S. T., Shwom, R. L., Brechin, S. R., & Allen, S. (2016). Ideology, capitalism, and climate: Explaining public views about climate change in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 21, 180-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.003

McCright, A. M., Dentzman, K., Charters, M., & Dietz, T. (2013). The influence of political ideology on trust in science. Environmental Research Letters, 8(4), 044029. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044029/pdf

Merkley, E., & Stecula, D. A. (2021). Party cues in the news: Democratic elites, Republican backlash, and the dynamics of climate skepticism. British Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 1439-1456. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000113

Midan Marketing (2023). Meat consumer segmentation 3.01: Insights report. https://midanmarketing.com/reports/meat-consumer-segmentation-3/

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Communicating Science Effectively: A Research Agenda. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23674.

Nemes, G., Chiffoleau, Y., Zollet, S., Collison, M., Benedek, Z., Colantuono, F., ... & Orbán, É. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on alternative and local food systems and the potential for the sustainability transition: Insights from 13 countries. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 591-599. https://doi-org.lib-e2.lib.ttu.edu/10.1016/j.spc.2021.06.022

Nukala, R., Panduru, K., Shields, A., Riordan, D., Doody, P., & Walsh, J. (2016, June). Internet of things: A review from ‘Farm to Fork’. In 2016 27th Irish Signals And Systems Conference (ISSC) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://ieeexplore-ieee-org.lib-e2.lib.ttu.edu/abstract/document/7528456

Oesterreicher, S., Lundy, L. K., Rumble, J. N., & Telg, R. W. (2018). Collegiate millennials' perceptions of locally produced beef. Journal of Applied Communications, 102(4). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2226

Oreskes, N. (2022). Eating less red meat is something individuals can do to help the climate crisis. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/eating-less-red-meat-is-something-individuals-can-do-to-help-the-climate-crisis/#:~:text=According%20to%20one%20recent%20study,gas%20emissions%20by%201%20percent

Powers, R., Li, N., Gibson, C., & Irlbeck, E. (2020). Consumers' evaluation of animal welfare labels on poultry products. Journal of Applied Communications, 104(1). https://newprairiepress.org/jac/vol104/iss1/1/

Runge, K. K., Brossard, D., & Xenos, M. A. (2018). Protective progressives to distrustful traditionalists: A post hoc segmentation method for science communication. Environmental Communication, 12(8), 1023-1045. https://doi-org.lib-e2.lib.ttu.edu/10.1080/17524032.2018.1513854

Ruth, T. K., & Rumble, J. N. (2016). Branding the berries: consumers' strawberry purchasing intent and their attitude toward florida strawberries. Journal of Applied Communications, 100(2), 28-43. https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.1028

Sanchez-Sabate, R., & Sabaté, J. (2019). Consumer attitudes towards environmental concerns of meat consumption: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(7), 1220. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071220

Schiermeier, Q. Eat less meat: UN climate-change report calls for change to human diet. (2019). Nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02409-7

Slater, M. D. (1996). Theory and method in health audience segmentation. Journal of Health Communication, 1(3), 267-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/108107396128059

Tam, K. P., & Chan, H. W. (2018). Generalized trust narrows the gap between environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior: Multilevel evidence. Global Environmental Change, 48, 182-194. https://doi-org.lib-e2.lib.ttu.edu/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.12.001

Taniguchi, H., & Marshall, G. A. (2018). Trust, political orientation, and environmental behavior. Environmental Politics, 27(3), 385-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1425275

Tarpley, T. G., Fischer, L. M., & Steede, G. M. (2020). How much transparency is too much? A moment-to-moment analysis of viewer comfort in response to animal slaughter videos. Journal of Applied Communications, 104(2). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2302

Telg, R. W., Lundy, L. Wandersee, C., Mukhtar, S., Smith, D., & Stoked, P. (2018). Perceptions of trust: Communicating climate change to cattle producers. Journal of Applied Communications, 102(3). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2207

Tuten, T. L. (2021). Social media marketing (4th ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.

Trudel, R. (2019). Sustainable consumption behavior. Consumer psychogology review, 2(1), 85-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1045

Tyson, A. (2021). On climate change, Republicans are open to some policy approaches, even as they assign the issue low priority. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/07/23/on-climate-change-republicans-are-open-to-some-policy-approaches-even-as-they-assign-the-issue-low-priority/

Tyson Foods. (2024). Our path to climate-smart beef. https://www.tysonfoods.com/climate-smart-beef-program

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2023). Sources of greenhouse gas emissions. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions

U.S. Roundtable for Sustainable Beef. (2024). USRSB high-priority indicator goals & sector targets. https://www.usrsb.org/goals

US Census Bureau (2022a). Quick facts: United States. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045222#PST045222

US Census Bureau (2022b). Age and sex. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/datasets/2020-2022/national/asrh/nc-est2022-agesex-res.csv

US Census Bureau (2022c). Estimates of the total resident population and resident population age 18 years and older for the United States, Regions, State, District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico: July 1, 2022. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/datasets/2020-2022/national/asrh/nc-est2022-agesex-res.csv

USDA. (2022a). Per capita red meat and poultry consumption expected to decrease modestly in 2022. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/chart-gallery/gallery/chart-detail/?chartId=103767#:~:text=The%20latest%20USDA%20forecast%20indicates,than%20the%202012%E2%80%9321%20average

USDA. (2022b). Partnerships for climate-smart commodities. https://www.usda.gov/climate-solutions/climate-smart-commodities

USDA. (2022c). Climate change. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/natural-resources-environment/climate-change/

Vytelle. (2022). Vytelle secures USDA climate-smart grant as part of an industry consortium to advance sustainable beef production. https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2022/10/06/2529551/0/en/Vytelle-secures-USDA-Climate-Smart-Grant-as-Part-of-an-Industry-Consortium-to-Advance-Sustainable-Beef-Production.html

Ward Jr, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301), 236-244.

Warner, L. A., Kumar Chaudhary, A., Rumble, J. N., Lamm, A. J., & Momol, E. (2017). Using audience segmentation to tailor residential irrigation water conservation programs. Journal of Agricultural Education, 58(1), 313-333. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2017.01313

Warner, L. A., Stubbs, E., Murphrey, T. P., & Huynh, P. (2016). Identification of the Competencies Needed to Apply Social Marketing to Extension Programming: Results of a Delphi Study. Journal of Agricultural Education, 57(2), 14-32. http://www.jae-online.org/attachments/article/1967/2016-2-02-Warner.pdf

Warner, L. A., Rumble, J., Martin, E., Lamm, A. J., & Cantrell, R. (2015). The effect of strategic message selection on residents' intent to conserve water in the landscape. Journal of Agricultural Education. 56(4). 59 - 74. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2015.04059

Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2014). Mass media research: An introduction (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

Orton, G., Fischer, L., & Kitten, K. (2024). Using Audience Segmentation to Identify Target Audiences for Climate-Smart Beef Production Communication. Journal of Agricultural Education, 65(3). Retrieved from https://jae-online.org/index.php/jae/article/view/2741

Issue

Section

Journal of Agricultural Education