Using Audience Segmentation to Identify Target Audiences for Climate-Smart Beef Production Communication
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v65i3.2741Keywords:
Climate-smart, audience segmentation, strategic communications, educationAbstract
In the face of increasing consumer scrutiny of the food supply chain, communication practitioners have been determined to understand public perceptions of the food production process from ‘farm to fork.’ The beef industry has been of particular interest due to the relatively high production emissions and an increased level of public support for environmentally friendly food behaviors, such as eating less beef. To address these concerns, the USDA and industry organizations are creating programs to incentivize and promote climate-smart beef production practices. Further, a new market is being created, where products may be labeled as ‘sustainable’ or ‘climate-smart.’ In order for this market to thrive, communicators and educators must strive to educate the public about these production practices; however, little is known about how to educate the public and market these climate-smart production techniques to the public. This study sought to identify and describe unique target audiences for educational communication about climate-smart beef production using audience segmentation. Through a K-means cluster analysis, we identified four strategic target audiences based on respondents’ climate change concern, political ideology, trust in science, and perception of the environmental responsibility of the beef industry. After, we described each cluster’s demographic characteristics, beef consumption frequency, attitude toward sustainable food products, and preferred communication sources to inform strategic communication efforts. This study provides insight and recommendations for educators and other practitioners communicating about climate-smart beef as well as areas of future research into this emergent area.
Downloads
References
Abrams, K. M., & Soukup, C. (2017). Matching local food messages to consumer motivators: An experiment comparing the effects of differently framed messages. Journal of Applied Communications, 101(4). http://dx.doi.org.lib-e2.lib.ttu.edu/10.4148/1051-0834.1297
American Society of Animal Science. (2015). Grand challenges. https://www.asas.org/docs/default-source/public-policy/gc_pages_web2015.pdf?sfvrsn=2
Arbuckle, M. B. (2016). The interaction of religion, political ideology, and concern about climate change in the United States. Society & Natural Resources, 30(2), 177-194. https://doi-org.lib-e2.lib.ttu.edu/10.1080/08941920.2016.1209267
Baker, R. J., Brick, M., Bates, N. A., Battaglia, M., Couper, M. P., Dever, J. A., & Gile, K. J. (2013). Summary report of the AAPOR task force on non-probability sampling. Journal of Survey Stastistics and Methodology, 1(2), 90-143. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smt008
Bonoma, T. V., & Shapiro, B. P. (1984). Evaluating market segmentation approaches. Industrial Marketing Management, 13(4), 257-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-8501(84)90021-X
Bostrom, A., Böhm, G., & O'Connor, R. E. (2013). Targeting and tailoring climate change communications. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4(5), 447-455. https://doi-org.lib-e2.lib.ttu.edu/10.1002/wcc.234
Bouman, T., Verschoor, M., Albers, C. J., Böhm, G., Fisher, S. D., Poortinga, W., & Steg, L. (2020). When worry about climate change leads to climate action: How values, worry and personal responsibility relate to various climate actions. Global Environmental Change, 62. https://doi-org.lib-e2.lib.ttu.edu/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102061
Burnier, P.C., Guerra, D.S., &Spers, E.E. (2021). Measuring consumer perceptions over beef good practices and sustainable production process, British Food Journal, 123(4), 1362-1383. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-12-2019-0904
Chinn, S., & Hart, P. S. (2021). Climate change consensus messages cause reactance. Environmental Communication, 1-9. https://doi-org.lib-
Cologna, V., & Siegrist, M. (2020). The role of trust for climate change mitigation and adaptation behaviour: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 69, 101428. https://doi-org.lib-e2.lib.ttu.edu/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101428
Cusworth, G., Lorimer, J., Brice, J., & Garnett, T. (2022). Green rebranding: Regenerative agriculture, future‐pasts, and the naturalisation of livestock. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 47(4), 1009-1027. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12555
de Leon, R. P., Wingrove, S., & Kay, A. C. (2020). Scientific skepticism and inequality: Political and ideological roots. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 91, 104045. https://doi-org.lib-e2.lib.ttu.edu/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104045
de Souza, M., Petre, R., Jackson, F., Hadarits, M., Pogue, S., Carlyle, C., Bork, E., & McAllister, T. (2017). A review of sustainability enhancements in the beef value chain: State-of-the-art and recommendations for future improvements. Animals, 7(12), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7030026
Detenber, B., Rosenthal, S., Liao, Y., & Ho, S. S. (2016). Climate and sustainability| audience segmentation for campaign design: Addressing climate change in Singapore. International Journal of Communication, 10, 23. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4696
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. John Wiley & Sons.
Dietz, T., Dan, A., & Shwom, R. (2007). Support for climate change policy: Social psychological and social structural influences. Rural sociology, 72(2), 185-214. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1526/003601107781170026
Donsbach, W., & Traugott, M. W. (Eds.). (2007). The SAGE handbook of public opinion research. Sage.
Essary, C., Fischer, L. M., & Irlbeck, E. (2021). A statistical approach to classification: A guide to hierarchical cluster analysis in agricultural communications research, Journal of Applied Communications, 87(3). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2431
Estes, S., Edgar, L. D., & Johnson, D. M. (2015). Consumer perceptions of poultry production: A focus on Arkansas, Journal of Applied Communications, 99(4). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.1057
Everitt, B. S., Landau, S., Leese, M., & Stahl, D. (2011). Cluster Analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
Fischer, L. M., Schroeder, E., Gibson, C., McCord, A., & Orton, G. (2023). An experimental study investigating the effects of data visualizations used in infographics on participant recall and information recognition. Journal of Applied Communications, 107(3), https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2489
Fischer, L. M, Cummins, R. G., Gilliam, K. C., Baker, M., Burris, S., & Irlbeck, E. (2018). Examining the critical moments in information processing of water conservation videos within young farmers and ranchers: A psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Agricultural Education, 59(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2018.02001
Fischer, L., Meyers, C., Cummins, R. G., Gibson, C., & Baker, M. (2020). Creating relevancy in scientific information: An analysis of the impact of motivational salience and involvement on visual attention. Journal of Applied Communications, 104(2), https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2287
Frey, S., Bar Am, J., Doshi, V., Malik, A., & Noble, S. (2023). Consumers care about sustainability-and back it up with their wallets. https://nielseniq.com/global/en/insights/report/2023/consumers-care-about-sustainability-and-back-it-up-with-their-wallets/
Gosnell, H., Emard, K., & Hyde, E. (2021). Taking stock of social sustainability and the US beef industry. Sustainability, 13(21), 11860. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111860
Gromet, D. M., Kunreuther, H., & Larrick, R. P. (2013). Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices. PNAS, 110(23), 9314-9319. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218453110
Grunig, J. (1989). Publics, audiences, and market segments: Segmentation principles for
campaigns. In C. Salmon (Ed.), Information campaigns: Balancing social values and social change, (p. 199–228). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Happer, C., Wellesley, L. (2019). Meat consumption, behaviour and the media environment: A focus group analysis across four countries. Food Security, 11, 123–139. https://doi-org.lib-e2.lib.ttu.edu/10.1007/s12571-018-0877-1
Hine, D. W., Reser, J. P., Morrison, M., Phillips, W. J., Nunn, P., & Cooksey, R. (2014). Audience segmentation and climate change communication: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(4), 441-459. https://wires-onlinelibrary-wiley-com.lib-e2.lib.ttu.edu/doi/pdf/10.1002/wcc.279
Huang, P., Lamm, A. J., & Dukes, M. D. (2016). Informing extension program development through audience segmentation: Targeting high water users. Journal of Agricultural Education, 57(2), 60-74. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2016.02060
KTVZ News Staff. (2022, November 13). 100+ Western ranchers launch major effort to raise climate-smart beef. East Idaho News. https://www.eastidahonews.com/2022/11/100-western-ranchers-launch-major-effort-to-raise-climate-smart-beef/
Lamm, A. J., & Lamm, K. W. (2019). Using non-probability sampling methods in agricultural and extension education research. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 26(1), 52-59. https://web.archive.org/web/20201127042955id_/https://www.aiaee.org/attachments/article/1742/7%20Non-Probability%20Sampling%20Methods%20in%20Ag_Lamm.pdf
Lehdonvirta, V., Oksanen, A., Räsänen, P., & Blank, G. (2021), Social media, web, and panel surveys: Using non-probability samples in social and policy research. Policy & Internet, 13, 134-155. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.238
Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2009). Global warming's six Americas 2009: An audience segmentation analysis. https://trid.trb.org/view/889822
McCright, A. M. (2009). The social bases of climate change knowledge, concern, and policy support in the U.S. general public. Hofstra Law Review, 37(4), 1017-1048. https://heinonline-org.law-ezp.law.ttu.edu/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hoflr37&div=38&id=&page=&collection=journals
McCright, A. M., Marquart-Pyatt, S. T., Shwom, R. L., Brechin, S. R., & Allen, S. (2016). Ideology, capitalism, and climate: Explaining public views about climate change in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 21, 180-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.003
McCright, A. M., Dentzman, K., Charters, M., & Dietz, T. (2013). The influence of political ideology on trust in science. Environmental Research Letters, 8(4), 044029. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044029/pdf
Merkley, E., & Stecula, D. A. (2021). Party cues in the news: Democratic elites, Republican backlash, and the dynamics of climate skepticism. British Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 1439-1456. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000113
Midan Marketing (2023). Meat consumer segmentation 3.01: Insights report. https://midanmarketing.com/reports/meat-consumer-segmentation-3/
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Communicating Science Effectively: A Research Agenda. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23674.
Nemes, G., Chiffoleau, Y., Zollet, S., Collison, M., Benedek, Z., Colantuono, F., ... & Orbán, É. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on alternative and local food systems and the potential for the sustainability transition: Insights from 13 countries. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 591-599. https://doi-org.lib-e2.lib.ttu.edu/10.1016/j.spc.2021.06.022
Nukala, R., Panduru, K., Shields, A., Riordan, D., Doody, P., & Walsh, J. (2016, June). Internet of things: A review from ‘Farm to Fork’. In 2016 27th Irish Signals And Systems Conference (ISSC) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://ieeexplore-ieee-org.lib-e2.lib.ttu.edu/abstract/document/7528456
Oesterreicher, S., Lundy, L. K., Rumble, J. N., & Telg, R. W. (2018). Collegiate millennials' perceptions of locally produced beef. Journal of Applied Communications, 102(4). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2226
Oreskes, N. (2022). Eating less red meat is something individuals can do to help the climate crisis. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/eating-less-red-meat-is-something-individuals-can-do-to-help-the-climate-crisis/#:~:text=According%20to%20one%20recent%20study,gas%20emissions%20by%201%20percent
Powers, R., Li, N., Gibson, C., & Irlbeck, E. (2020). Consumers' evaluation of animal welfare labels on poultry products. Journal of Applied Communications, 104(1). https://newprairiepress.org/jac/vol104/iss1/1/
Runge, K. K., Brossard, D., & Xenos, M. A. (2018). Protective progressives to distrustful traditionalists: A post hoc segmentation method for science communication. Environmental Communication, 12(8), 1023-1045. https://doi-org.lib-e2.lib.ttu.edu/10.1080/17524032.2018.1513854
Ruth, T. K., & Rumble, J. N. (2016). Branding the berries: consumers' strawberry purchasing intent and their attitude toward florida strawberries. Journal of Applied Communications, 100(2), 28-43. https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.1028
Sanchez-Sabate, R., & Sabaté, J. (2019). Consumer attitudes towards environmental concerns of meat consumption: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(7), 1220. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071220
Schiermeier, Q. Eat less meat: UN climate-change report calls for change to human diet. (2019). Nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02409-7
Slater, M. D. (1996). Theory and method in health audience segmentation. Journal of Health Communication, 1(3), 267-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/108107396128059
Tam, K. P., & Chan, H. W. (2018). Generalized trust narrows the gap between environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior: Multilevel evidence. Global Environmental Change, 48, 182-194. https://doi-org.lib-e2.lib.ttu.edu/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.12.001
Taniguchi, H., & Marshall, G. A. (2018). Trust, political orientation, and environmental behavior. Environmental Politics, 27(3), 385-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1425275
Tarpley, T. G., Fischer, L. M., & Steede, G. M. (2020). How much transparency is too much? A moment-to-moment analysis of viewer comfort in response to animal slaughter videos. Journal of Applied Communications, 104(2). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2302
Telg, R. W., Lundy, L. Wandersee, C., Mukhtar, S., Smith, D., & Stoked, P. (2018). Perceptions of trust: Communicating climate change to cattle producers. Journal of Applied Communications, 102(3). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2207
Tuten, T. L. (2021). Social media marketing (4th ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.
Trudel, R. (2019). Sustainable consumption behavior. Consumer psychogology review, 2(1), 85-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1045
Tyson, A. (2021). On climate change, Republicans are open to some policy approaches, even as they assign the issue low priority. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/07/23/on-climate-change-republicans-are-open-to-some-policy-approaches-even-as-they-assign-the-issue-low-priority/
Tyson Foods. (2024). Our path to climate-smart beef. https://www.tysonfoods.com/climate-smart-beef-program
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2023). Sources of greenhouse gas emissions. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions
U.S. Roundtable for Sustainable Beef. (2024). USRSB high-priority indicator goals & sector targets. https://www.usrsb.org/goals
US Census Bureau (2022a). Quick facts: United States. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045222#PST045222
US Census Bureau (2022b). Age and sex. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/datasets/2020-2022/national/asrh/nc-est2022-agesex-res.csv
US Census Bureau (2022c). Estimates of the total resident population and resident population age 18 years and older for the United States, Regions, State, District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico: July 1, 2022. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/datasets/2020-2022/national/asrh/nc-est2022-agesex-res.csv
USDA. (2022a). Per capita red meat and poultry consumption expected to decrease modestly in 2022. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/chart-gallery/gallery/chart-detail/?chartId=103767#:~:text=The%20latest%20USDA%20forecast%20indicates,than%20the%202012%E2%80%9321%20average
USDA. (2022b). Partnerships for climate-smart commodities. https://www.usda.gov/climate-solutions/climate-smart-commodities
USDA. (2022c). Climate change. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/natural-resources-environment/climate-change/
Vytelle. (2022). Vytelle secures USDA climate-smart grant as part of an industry consortium to advance sustainable beef production. https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2022/10/06/2529551/0/en/Vytelle-secures-USDA-Climate-Smart-Grant-as-Part-of-an-Industry-Consortium-to-Advance-Sustainable-Beef-Production.html
Ward Jr, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301), 236-244.
Warner, L. A., Kumar Chaudhary, A., Rumble, J. N., Lamm, A. J., & Momol, E. (2017). Using audience segmentation to tailor residential irrigation water conservation programs. Journal of Agricultural Education, 58(1), 313-333. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2017.01313
Warner, L. A., Stubbs, E., Murphrey, T. P., & Huynh, P. (2016). Identification of the Competencies Needed to Apply Social Marketing to Extension Programming: Results of a Delphi Study. Journal of Agricultural Education, 57(2), 14-32. http://www.jae-online.org/attachments/article/1967/2016-2-02-Warner.pdf
Warner, L. A., Rumble, J., Martin, E., Lamm, A. J., & Cantrell, R. (2015). The effect of strategic message selection on residents' intent to conserve water in the landscape. Journal of Agricultural Education. 56(4). 59 - 74. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2015.04059
Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2014). Mass media research: An introduction (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
