Perceptions and Preparedness: An Investigation of Agricultural Education Teachers' Self-Efficacy for Including Students with Learning Disabilities in Supervised Agricultural Experience Programs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v65i4.2841Keywords:
learning disabilities, supervised agricultural experience, individualized education programs, inclusive classroom strategies, diverse learnersAbstract
This study explored secondary [STATE] school-based agricultural education (SBAE) teachers' perceptions of instructing students with learning disabilities in Supervised Agricultural Experiences (SAEs) programs. The perceived importance and competence levels of SBAE teachers utilizing individualized education programs (IEPs), implementing inclusive classroom practices, and adapting instruction for diverse learners were addressed using Bandura's self-efficacy theory. A post-positivist, descriptive correlational design was used to gather and analyze collected data. The instrument contained 65 questions and statements separated into six sections: 1) Individualized Education Programs (IEPs); 2) best management practices for the agriculture classroom and SAE; 3) implementing teaching strategies based on learning challenges; 4) changes in the IEP population; 5) current IEP population; and 6) personal characteristics. The questions were categorized into sections to determine the educator’s perception of Individualized Education Programs alone before introducing IEPs in the various components of the agriculture classroom. A Borich Model was used to determine the educator’s perceived level of importance as well as the level of competence. Participants (n = 43) acknowledged the high importance of including students with disabilities, needing additional training to utilize student IEPs to tailor instruction effectively, and equipping new teachers with the skills needed for selecting appropriate instructional strategies to improve student learning. These discrepancies suggest a need for targeted professional development to enhance teachers' confidence and skills. The findings highlight areas for improvement, such as effectively using IEPs, implementing best practices for inclusive learning environments in classrooms and SAEs, and selecting appropriate teaching strategies for students with varying needs.
Downloads
References
Atkinson Jr, M. R. (2020). Self-efficacy of early career agriculture teachers and its relationship to career commitment and job satisfaction. [Doctoral dissertation, Auburn University].
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.
Barrick, R. K., & Estepp, C. M. (2011). Experience programs in agriscience education: From projects to SAEPs and beyond. Agricultural Education Magazine, 83(4), 26-27
Buell, M. J., Hallam, R., Gamel-Mccormick, M., & Scheer, S. (1999). A survey of general and special education teachers' perceptions and in-service needs concerning inclusion. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 46(2), 143–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/103491299100597
Caillouet, O., & Harder, A. (2022). Conducting the needs assessment #8: The Borich model. EDIS, 2022(2). https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-w415-2022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-w415-2022
Clemons, C. A., Heidenreich, A. E., & Lindner, J. R. (2018). Assessing the technical expertise and content needs of Alabama agriscience teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 59(3), 87 – 99. https://doi.10.5032/jae.2018.03087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2018.03087
Clemons, C. A., & Lindner, J. R. (2019). Teacher longevity and career satisfaction in the secondary agricultural education classroom. Journal of Agricultural Education, 60(1), 186 – 201. https://doi.org/10.5032.jae.2019.01186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2019.01186
Cologon, K. (2013). Inclusion in education. Issues Paper.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dormody, T. J., Seevers, B. S., Andreasen, R. J., & VanLeeuwen, D. (2006). Challenges experienced by New Mexico agricultural education teachers in including special needs students. Journal of Agricultural Education, 47(2), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2006.02093 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2006.02093
Doss, W., & Rayfield, J. (2019). Assessing school-based agricultural education teacher familiarity, knowledge, and perceptions of supervised agricultural experience categories. Journal of Agricultural Education, 60(3). https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2019.03206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2019.03206
Dyer, J. E., & Osborne, E. W. (1995). Participation in supervised agricultural experience programs: A synthesis of research. Journal of Agricultural Education, 36(1), 6–14. https://doi:10.5032/jae.1995.01006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.1995.01006
Foster, R. M. (1986). Factors limiting vocational agriculture student participation in supervised occupational experience programs in Nebraska. Journal of the American Association of Teacher Educators in Agriculture, 27(4), 45–50. https://doi:10.5032/jaatea.1986.04045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jaatea.1986.04045
Giffing, M., Warnick, B., Tarpley, R., & Williams, N. (2010). Perceptions of agriculture teachers toward including students with disabilities. Journal of Agricultural Education, 51(2), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2010.02102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2010.02102
Harvey, M. (2001). The efficacy of vocational education for students with disabilities concerning post-school employment outcomes: A review of the literature. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 38(3).
Harrison, J. R., Soares, D. A., & Joyce, J. (2018). Inclusion of students with emotional and behavioural disorders in general education settings: A scoping review of research in the US. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(12), 1209–1231. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1444107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1444107
Hummel, W. G., & Hummel, B. R. (1913). Materials and methods in high school agriculture. MacMillan.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004)
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. (2021) Special Education Annual Reports. https://sites.ed.gov/idea/2021-individuals-with-disabilities-education-act-annual-report-to-congress/
Johnson, L., Wilson, E., Flowers, J., & Croom, B. (2012). Perceptions of North Carolina high school agricultural educators regarding students with special needs participating in supervised agriculture experiences and FFA activities. Journal of Agricultural Education, 53(4) 41 – 54. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2012.04041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2012.04041
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi-org.spot.lib.auburn.edu/10.1177/001316447003000308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
Lewis, L. J., Rayfield, J., & Moore, L. L. (2012). An assessment of students’ perceptions toward factors influencing supervised agricultural experience participation. Journal of Agricultural Education, 53(4), 55–69. https://doi:10.5032/jae.2012.04055 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2012.04055
Lindner, J. R., Murphy, T. H., & Briers, G. E. (2001). Handling nonresponse in social science research. Journal of Agricultural Education, 42(4), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2001.04043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2001.04043
Lindner, J. R., & Lindner, N. (2024). Interpreting Likert type, summate, unidimensional, and attitudinal scales: I neither agree nor disagree, Likert or not. Advancements in Agricultural Development, 5(2), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v5i2.351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v5i2.351
McKibben, J. D., Clemons, C. A., & Nurradin, M. (2022). Hybrid vigor: A quantitative analysis of job satisfaction of United States school-based secondary agricultural education classrooms. Journal of Agricultural Education, 63(2), 238 – 250. https://doi.10.5032/jae.2022.02238 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2022.02238
McKibben, J. D., Hyjeck, A., Clemons, C. A., Hancock, G., & Yopp, A. (2024). Serving to learn: increasing agriculture students’ self-efficacy through service-learning. NACTA Journal, 68(1). https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v68i1.136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v68i1.136
Narine, L., & Harder, A. (2021). Comparing the Borich model with the ranked discrepancy model for competency assessment: A novel approach. Advancements in Agricultural Development, 2(3), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v2i3.169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v2i3.169
National Center for Educational Statistics. (2024). Students with disabilities. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cgg/students-with-disabilities
Pense, S. L., Freeburg, B. W., & Clemons, C. A. (2015). Implementation of common core state standards: Voices, positions, and frames. Career and Technical Education Research, 40(3), 157 – 173. https://doi.org/10.5328/cter40.3.157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5328/cter40.3.157
Ramage, R., Stair, K. S., Roberts, R., & Blackburn, J. J. (2022). Female agriculture teachers’ lived experiences and perceived professional development needs when teaching students with special needs. Journal of Agricultural Education, 63(4), 105 – 118. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2022.04105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2022.04105
Ross, M. (2010). Applied Quantitative Methods in Education. Kendall Hunt.
Rubenstein, E. D., & Thoron, A. C. (2015). Supervised agricultural experience programs: An examination of committed teachers and student-centered programs. Journal of Agricultural Education, 56(4), 75 – 89. https://doi:10.5032/jae.2015.04075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2015.04075
Smith-Hughes National Vocational Education Act of 1917, 45 C.F.R. § 104.56 (1960).
Stair, K. S. (2009). Identifying confidence levels and instructional strategies of high school agriculture education teachers when working with students with special needs (Publication No. 2009. 3357838) [Doctoral dissertation, North Carolina State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
Stair, K. S., & Moore, G. E. (2010). Including special needs students in ag ed. Techniques: Connecting Education and Careers, 85(4), 52–55.
Stimson, R. W. (1919). Vocational agricultural education by home projects. Macmillan.
Smith, K. L. & Rayfield, J. (2016). An early historical examination of the educational inlet of supervised agricultural experiences (SAEs) and project-based learning in agricultural education. Journal of Agricultural Education, 57(2), 146–160. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2016.02146 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2016.02146
Talbert, B. A., Croom, B., LaRose, S. E., Vaughn, R. C., & Lee, J. S. (2022). Foundations of Agricultural Education. Purdue University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1zjgbnr
Teixeira, K.L., & Edwards, M.C. (2020). Teaching students with special needs in school-
based, Agricultural education: A historical inquiry. Journal of Research in Technical
Careers, 4(1), 75-95. https://doi.org/10.9741/2578-2118.1066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9741/2578-2118.1066
Vocational Education Act of 1963: Hearings before the general subcommittee on education of the committee on education and labor, House of Representatives, 88th Cong. 1 (1963).
Wilson, L. J. (2013). The impacts of inclusive learning on special needs students, traditional students, and faculty in the agricultural education classroom. (Publication No. 357) [Masters theses, Southern Illinois University]. Research Papers. htttp://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/gs_rp/357
Wilkins, T. (2018). Determining the inclusiveness of students with disabilities in Iowa
agricultural classrooms (Publication No. 2018. 10975908) [Master’s theses, Iowa State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
Wilkens-Brittain, T., Smalley, S. W., & Hainline, M. S. (2022). Describing the inclusiveness of students with disabilities in Iowa school-based agricultural education programs. Journal of Agricultural Education, 63(3), 1 – 15. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2022.03001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2022.03001