Exploring Work Expectations of National FFA Alumni Belonging to Generation Z
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v66i4.3203Keywords:
Generation Z, workplace expectations,, workplace attractiveness, National FFA Organization.Abstract
With the accelerating pace of the Silent Generation and Baby Boomer retirements from the workforce, agricultural companies need to understand how to recruit and retain the next generation of workers. The generation currently entering the workforce has been labeled Generation Z. The purpose of this study was to explore the career expectations among National FFA members belonging to Generation Z and describe the relationship between the respondents’ demographics and the factors associated with employer attractiveness. The population for this study were past FFA members between the ages of 18 and 25 who were a part of one of three groups: American FFA Degree recipients, FFA Alumni and Supporters, or Forever Blue Network. Data were collected in the spring of 2023. Conclusions include agricultural employers must incorporate the five workplace attractiveness values (social, development, economic, interest, application) into their organizational culture, policies, and practices; Generation Z employees who are unwilling to move for the job are less likely to be willing to meet company expectations beyond a typical work week. Agricultural employers can use this study to tailor their recruitment strategies, work expectations, and support mechanisms for Generation Z employees. Agriculture teachers can use this study in their preparation of School-Based Agricultural Education students for agricultural careers. This can help ensure the agricultural industry's growth and relevance by aligning education, career pathways, and employer engagement with the preferences of Generation Z.
Downloads
References
Angeline, T. (2011). Managing generational diversity at the workplace: Expectations and perceptions of different generations of employees. African Journal of Business Management, 5(2), 249–255.
Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61(8), 1139-1160.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708094863 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708094863
Berthon, P., Ewing, M., & Hah, L. L. (2005). Captivating company: Dimensions of attractiveness in employer branding. International Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2005.11072912 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2005.11072912
Bretz, R. D., Jr., Ash, R. A., & Dreher, G. F. (1989). Do people make the place? An examination of the attraction-selection-attrition hypothesis. Personnel Psychology, 42(3), 561–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1989.tb00669.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1989.tb00669.x
Cennamo, L., & Gardner, D. (2008). Generational differences in work values, outcomes and person‐organisation values fit. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 891–906. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940810904385 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940810904385
Chapman, D., Uggerslev, K., Carroll, S., Piasentin, K., & Jones, D. (2005). Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: A meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 928–944. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.928 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.928
Coulter, K. J., Goecker, D. A., & Stanton, M. (1990). Employment opportunities for college graduates in the food and agricultural sciences, agriculture, natural resources, and veterinary medicine. U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Coulter, K. J., & Stanton, M. (1980). Graduates of higher education in the food and agricultural sciences: An analysis of supply/demand relationships. Volume I--Agriculture, Natural Resources, and Veterinary Medicine (ED193978). U.S. Department of Agriculture. ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED193978.pdf
Coulter, K. J., Stanton, M., & Goecker, D. A. (1985). Employment opportunities for college graduates in the food and agricultural sciences, agriculture, natural resources, and veterinary medicine. U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Dailey, A. L., Conroy, C. A., & Shelley-Tolbert, C. A. (2001). Using agricultural education as the context to teach life skills. Journal of Agricultural Education, 42(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2001.01011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2001.01011
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The Tailored Design Method. John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394260645
Dimock, M. (2019). Defining generations: Where Millennials end, and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/
Dolot, A. (2018). The characteristics of Generation Z. E-mentor, 74(2), 44–50. https://doi.org/ 10.15219/em74.1351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15219/em74.1351
Eger, L., Mičík, M., Gangur, M., & Řehoř, P. (2019). Employer branding: Exploring attractiveness dimensions in a multicultural context. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 25(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2019.9387 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2019.9387
Feldt, H., Kirtz, L., Marx, M., Nebelung, N., Vad, V., & Stamm, J. (2019). Preparing and accessing decent work amongst rural youth in Cambodia. FAO and Humboldt University of Berlin. https://doi.org/10.4060/CA5630EN DOI: https://doi.org/10.4060/CA5630EN
Fernandez, J. M., Goecker, A. D., Smith, E., Moran, E. R, & Wilson, C. A. (2020). Employment opportunities for college graduates in food, and agriculture, renewable natural resources and the environment United States, 2020-2025. U.S. Department of Agriculture. https://www.purdue.edu/usda/employment/
Food and Agriculture Organization. (2014). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Gabrielova, K., & Buchko, A. A. (2021). Here comes Generation Z: Millennials as managers. Business Horizons, 64(4), 489–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2021.02.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2021.02.013
Goecker, A. D., Coulter, K. J., & Stanton, M. (1995). Employment opportunities for college graduates in the food and agricultural sciences, agriculture, natural resources, and veterinary medicine 1995-2000. U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Goecker, A., D., Gilmore, J. L., Smith, E., & Smith, G. P. (2005). Employment opportunities for college graduates.in the U.S. food, agricultural, and natural resources system. U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Goecker, A. D., Smith, P. G., Fernandez, J. M., Ali, R., & Theller, R. G. (2015). Employment opportunities for college graduates in food, agriculture, renewable natural resources, and the environment: United States, 2015–2020. U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture. https://www.purdue.edu/usda/employment
Goecker, A. D., Smith, P. G., Smith, E., & Goetz, R. (2010). Employment opportunities for college graduates.in the U.S. food, agricultural, and natural resources system. U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Goecker, A. D., Whatley, M. C., & Gilmore, J. L. (2000). Employment opportunities for college graduates in the food and agricultural sciences, agriculture, natural resources, and veterinary medicine. U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Hershatter, A., & Epstein, M. (2010). Millennials and the world of work: An organization and management perspective. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9160-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9160-y
IFAD. (2014). IFAD annual report. https://www.ifad.org/en/web/knowledge/-/publication/ifad-annual-report-2014
Iorgulescu, M. C. (2016). Generation Z and its perception of work. Cross-Cultural Management Journal, 18(01), 47–54.
Jelinski, M. D., Campbell, J. R., Lissemore, K., & Miller, L. M. (2008). Demographics and career path choices of graduates from three Canadian veterinary colleges. The Canadian Veterinary Journal, 49(10), 995.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
Krommendijk, K. (2020). Generational differences in employer preferences: Using the employer attractiveness scale in the Netherlands [Unpublished master's thesis], Utrecht University.
Kuron, L., Lyons, S., Schweitzer, L., & Ng, E. (2015). Millennials’ work values: Differences across the school to work transition. Personnel Review, 44, 991–1009. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-01-2014-0024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-01-2014-0024
Lamm, K. W., & Priest, K. L. (2019) Evaluating the role of leader member exchange in leadership development program satisfaction. Journal of Agricultural Education, 60(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2019.03001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2019.03001
Lindner, J., Murphy, T., & Briers, G. (2001). Handling nonresponse in social science research. Journal of Agricultural Education, 42(4), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2001.04043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2001.04043
Moore, S., Grunberg, L., & Krause, A. J. (2015). Generational differences in workplace expectations: A comparison of production and professional workers. Current Psychology, 34(2), 346–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9261-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9261-2
National FFA Organization. (2024). About FFA. https://www.ffa.org
Ng, E. S. W., Schweitzer, L., & Lyons, S. T. (2010). New generation, great expectations: A field study of the Millennial generation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9159-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9159-4
Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Nurjanah, D., & Indawati, N. (2021). Effect of emotional intelligence on employee engagement and job satisfaction with work-life balance as intervening variables in the generation Z in Surabaya. International Journal of Economics, Management, Business and Social Science, 1(3), 316–328. https://doi.org/10.21009/JOBBE.006.1.04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/JOBBE.006.1.04
Ozkan, M., & Solmaz, B. (2015). The changing face of the employees - Generation Z and their perceptions of work (a study applied to university students). Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 476–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00876-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00876-X
Peterson, R. A. (1994). A meta-analysis of Cronbach’s coefficient alpha. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1086/209405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/209405
Ployhart, R. E., Weekley, J. A., & Baughman, K. (2006). The structure and function of human capital emergence: A multilevel examination of the attraction-selection-attrition model. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 661–677. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083023
Ritz, A., & Waldner, C. (2011). Competing for future leaders a study of attractiveness of public sector organizations to potential job applicants. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 31, 291–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X11408703 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X11408703
Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40(3), 437–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00609.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00609.x
Schneider, B., Smith, D. B., & Goldstein, H. W. (2000). Attraction–selection–attrition: Toward a person–environment psychology of organizations. In W. B. Walsh, K. H. Craik, & R. H. Price (Eds.). Person–environment psychology: New directions and perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 61–85). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Schullery, N. (2013). Workplace engagement and generational differences in values. Business Communication Quarterly, 76, 252–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569913476543 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569913476543
Seifert, C. F., Van Ness, R. K., Eddy, E. R., Buff, C., & D’Abate, C. P. (2023). Generational work ethic differences: From Baby Boomers to Gen Z. Journal of Managerial Issues, 35(4), 401–422.
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Talbert, B. A., & Balschweid, M. A. (2006). Career aspirations of selected FFA members. Journal of Agricultural Education, 47(2), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2006.02067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2006.02067
United Nations. (2017). World population prospects: The 2017 revision DESA publications. https://desapublications.un.org/publications/world-population-prospects-2017-revision
Wolf, K. J., Hoyle, T., Smith, K. L., & Foltz, J. (2020). The relationship between FFA participation and career decision self-efficacy. NACTA Journal, 65, 548–557.
Wong, M., Gardiner, E., Lang, W., & Coulon, L. (2008). Generational differences in personality and motivation: Do they exist and what are the implications for the workplace? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 878–890. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940810904376 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940810904376
Zaremohzzabieh, Z., Krauss, S. E., D’Silva, J. L., Tiraieyari, N., Ismail, I. A., & Dahalan, D. (2022). Towards agriculture as career: Predicting students’ participation in the agricultural sector using an extended model of the theory of planned behavior. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 28(1), 67–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2021.1910523 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2021.1910523
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
