From Graduate Coursework to Classroom Practice: SBAE Teachers’ Beliefs and Intentions to Use Social Science Research

Erin Gorter; Hannah C. Parker; Nicole Ray

doi:10.5032/jae.v67i4.3483

Authors

Erin Gorter Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3001-2251
Hannah C. Parker New Mexico State University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3290-3840
Nicole Ray Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1539-0879

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v67i4.3483

Keywords:

Teacher Beliefs, Graduate Education, Agricultural Education, Mixed Methods, Teacher Intentions

Abstract

This explanatory sequential mixed methods study examined school-based agricultural education teachers’ behavioral, normative, and control beliefs and their intentions to use social science research concepts after completing a graduate-level course. Grounded in the Theory of Planned Behavior, the quantitative phase used a correlational design to analyze survey responses (n = 10) through descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression. Teachers held favorable behavioral beliefs, finding the concepts beneficial, good, enjoyable, important, and necessary, yet they viewed them as less essential or valuable. Normative beliefs were low to moderate, with influence from colleagues and administrators, while control beliefs were stronger, reflecting autonomy and perceived capability, though uncertainty remained about application. Exploratory regression analysis indicated that behavioral beliefs had the largest observed standardized association with teachers’ intentions. The qualitative phase contextualized these findings through themes of Functionality, where teachers viewed the concepts as relevant and useful, and Tension of Alignment, where teachers negotiated how social science research fit within their teaching philosophies and students’ engagement. Findings suggest that reinforcing perceived value, clarifying practical application, and connecting content to student interest are key to supporting teachers’ intention and long-term use of social science research concepts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t

Ajzen, I. (2006). Behavioral interventions based on the theory of planned behavior. University of Massachusetts System. http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.intervention.pdf

Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555

DiBenedetto, C. A. (2024). Education needs of school-based agriculture teachers to prepare students for the 21st century. In R. K. Barrick & A. C. Thoron (Eds.), Emerging research in agricultural teacher education (pp. 205–226). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2766-1.ch011

Dillman, D. A. (2011). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method-2007 Update with new Internet, visual, and mixed-mode guide. John Wiley & Sons.

Field, A. (2024). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. SAGE Publications.

Foster, D. D., Rice, L. L., & Foster, M. J. M. (2024). Global learning in agriculture: Cultivating global competency in agricultural educators and global impact in agricultural education. In R. K. Barrick & A. C. Thoron (Eds.), Emerging Research in Agricultural Teacher Education (pp. 314-346). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2766-1.ch016

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). SAGE Publications.

Knobloch, N. A., & Wang, H. H. (2024). Integrated STEM in school-based agricultural education. In R. K. Barrick & A. C. Thoron (Eds.), Emerging research in agricultural teacher education (pp. 227-248). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2766-1.ch012

Leman, A. M., Martin, M. J., Hartmann, K. A., & Griffith, A. N. (2024). Approaches to agricultural education research informed by diversity, equity, inclusion, and access. In R. K. Barrick & A. C. Thoron (Eds.), Emerging research in agricultural teacher education (pp. 294-313). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2766-1.ch015

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

Lindner, J. R., Murphy, T. H., & Briers, G. E. (2001). Handling nonresponse in social research. Journal of Agricultural Education, 42(4), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2001.04043

McKim, A. J., Pauley, C. M., Velez, J. J., & Sorensen, T. (2018). Interdisciplinary learning opportunities in agriculture, food, natural resources, and science: The role of the teacher. Journal of Agricultural Education, 59(2), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2018.02179

McHugh, S. K., Mulkey, F., Byrd, A. P., & Thoron, A. (2024). Instructional methods in school-based agricultural education. In R. K. Barrick & A. C. Thoron (Eds.), Emerging research in agricultural teacher education (pp. 31–51). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2766-1.ch003

Menard, S. (2001). Applied logistic regression analysis. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983433

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

National FFA Organization. (2025). 2025 Agriscience fair award program. https://ffa.app.box.com/s/x4rd2h4a6fvwkrf5yogk9jbwwxouehnr/file/1621703913393

O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673-690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6

Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307

Pithers, R. T., & Soden, R. (2000). Critical thinking in education: A review. Educational Research, 42(3), 237-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/001318800440579

Ray, N., Gorter, E., & Giannone, L. (2024). Interdisciplinary agriculture, food, and natural resources with Next Generation Science Standards. In R. K. Barrick & A. C. Thoron (Eds.), Emerging research in agricultural teacher education (pp. 249–279). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2766-1.ch013

Roberts, T. G., & Ball, A. L. (2009). Secondary agricultural science as content and context for teaching. Journal of Agricultural Education, 50(1), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2009.01081

Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE Publications.

Smalley, S. W. (2024). Teacher needs and professional development in agricultural education. In R. K. Barrick & A. C. Thoron (Eds.), Emerging research in agricultural teacher education (pp. 191–204). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2766-1.ch010

Surmiak, A. D. (2018). Confidentiality in qualitative research involving vulnerable participants: Researchers’ perspectives. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3099

Thiel, B. L., & Marx, A. A. (2019). The influence of agriscience research SAEs on perceived self-efficacy of 21st century skill attainment. Journal of Agricultural Education, 60(1), 80-95. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2019.01080

Thiel, B. L., & Marx, A. A. (2021). Making the jump: What led agriscience teachers to adopt agriscience research SAEs? Journal of Agricultural Education, 62(3), 167-184. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2021.03167

Torres, R. M., Kitchel, T. J., & Ball, A. L. (2010). Preparing and advancing teachers of agricultural education. Curriculum Materials Service.

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). SAGE Publications.