Evaluating Retention Factors of Teachers Implementing CASE Curriculum in Agricultural Education Programs

Scott Smalley; Amber H. Rice; Joe Ramstad

doi:10.5032/jae.v67i2.3282

Authors

Scott Smalley Iowa State University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8386-4266
Amber Rice Iowa State University
Joe Ramstad Iowa State University https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5594-399X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v67i2.3282

Keywords:

Curriculum, CASE curriculum, Professional development, School-based agricultural education

Abstract

Across the United States, there continues to be a significant shortage of agricultural educators. As a result, retaining quality and qualified agricultural educators is an urgent need. The Curriculum for Agricultural Science Education (CASE) provides agricultural educators the opportunity to earn curriculum certification in a range of agriculturally focused content areas. Teachers can receive training and access to teaching materials and resources to implement the CASE curriculum within their agricultural education programs, providing students with rich, inquiry-based learning experiences. The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a connection between SBAE teachers’ earning of at least one CASE certification and their reports of satisfying a multitude of retention factors within the school-based agricultural education (SBAE) profession. As such, this study examined perceptions associated with CASE implementation, which connect to retention factors, as opposed to causal effects on retention in and of itself. All CASE-certified educators were emailed a questionnaire via Qualtrics. Results indicated that teachers’ implementation of CASE resulted in several beneficial factors that can assist in retaining teachers, including improved work-life balance, greater comfort with implementing new teaching methodologies, and enhanced teacher networking. Results also revealed barriers that CASE can address to strengthen the CASE curriculum and better assist educators. Future research should explore the impact of the CASE curriculum on teachers’ work-life balance, perceived teaching ability, and facilitating quality inquiry-based learning experiences for students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ary, D., Jacobs. L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Wadsworth.

Albritton, M. C., & Roberts, T. G. (2020). Agricultural technical skills needed by entry level agriculture teachers: A modified Delphi study. Journal of Agricultural Education, 61(1), 140–151. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.01140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.01140

Bird, T. D., & Rice A. H. (2021). The influence of CASE on agriculture teachers’ use of inquiry-based methods. Journal of Agricultural Education, 62(1). 260–275. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2021.01260 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2021.01260

Boone, J., & Boone, D. A. (2009). An assessment of problems faced by high school agricultural education teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 50(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2009.01021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2009.01021

Clemons, C. A., & Lindner, J. R. (2019). Teacher longevity and career satisfaction in the secondary agricultural education classroom. Journal of Agricultural Education, 60(1), 186–201. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2019.01186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2019.01186

Creswell, J. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika (16), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555

Croom, D. B. (2008). The development of the integrated three-component model of agricultural education. Journal of Agricultural Education, 49(1), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2008.01110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2008.01110

Curriculum for Agricultural Science Education. (2024). Home. https://www.case4learning.org

Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394260645

Frankfort-Nachmias, C., Leon-Guerrero, A., & Davis, G. (2021). Social statistics for a diverse society (9th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Frey, B. B. (2016). There’s a stat for that! What to do & when to do it. SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071909775

Granberry, T., Blackburn, J. J., & Roberts, R. (2023). The state of agricultural mechanics in the preparation of school-based agricultural education teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 64(4), 144–158. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v64i4.160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v64i4.160

Guffey, K. B., & Young, J. S. (2020). Recruitment and retention of agriculture teachers in the Southeast: An empirical analysis of the STAR program. Journal of Agricultural Education, 61(4), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.04203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.04203

Haddad, B., Knight, K. J., Stewart, J., & Velez, J. J. (2020). Will the first through fifth years please stand up? Quantifying national SBAE teacher experience. Journal of Agricultural Education, 61(4), 266–282. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.04266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.04266

Hainline, M., & Smalley, S. (2023). Determining the professional development needs of Iowa school-based agricultural education teachers related to program design, leadership, and SAE development. Journal of Agricultural Education, 64(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v64i1.26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v64i1.26

Haynes, M. (2014). On the path to equity: Improving the effectiveness of beginning teachers. https://all4ed.org/reports-factsheets/path-to-equity/

Lavrakas, P. J. (2008). Encyclopedia of survey research methods. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947

Lemons, L. L., Brashears, M. T., Burris, S., Meyers, C., & Price, M. A. (2015). Factors contributing to attrition as reported by leavers of secondary agriculture programs. Journal of Agricultural Education, 56(4), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2015.04017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2015.04017

Mason, S., & Matas, P. C. (2015). Teacher attrition and retention research in Australia: Towards a new theoretical framework. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(11), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n11.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n11.3

McKendree, R. B., & McKim, A. J. (2021). Teacher changing the discipline: A case study of participatory professional development. Journal of Agricultural Education, 62(3), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2021.03072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2021.03072

McKim, A., & McKim, L. K. (2023). Enhancing professional development by increasing agricultural educator margin. Journal of Agricultural Education, 64(3), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v64i3.48 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v64i3.48

McKim & Velez J. J. (2017). Developing self-efficacy: Exploring preservice coursework, teaching, and professional development experiences. Journal of Agricultural Education, 58(2), 284–298. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2017.01172 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2017.01172

Mehmetoglu, M., & Jakobsen, T. G. (2022). Applied statistics using Stata: A guide for the social sciences (2nd ed). SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036231446

Moser, E. M., & McKim, A. J. (2020). Teacher retention: A relational perspective. Journal of Agricultural Education, 61(2), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.02263 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.02263

National Association of Agricultural Educators (2015). Ag teacher’s life cycle. https://www.naae.org/lifecycle/index.cfm

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Pedota, P. J. (2015). How can student success support teacher self-efficacy and retention? The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 88(2), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2014.998600 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2014.998600

Rada, L. L. (2023). The relationship between psychological needs satisfaction and professional commitment of Minnesota school-based agricultural education teachers (Order No. 30311056) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.

Shuls, J. V., & Flores, J. M. (2020). Improving teacher retention through support and development. Journal of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, 4(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1282763

Smith, A. R., & Smalley, S. (2018). Job stress, burnout, and professional development of mid- career agricultural education teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 59(2), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2018.02305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2018.02305

Smith, A. R., Spiess, M., Foster, D. D., & Lawver, R. G. (2024). National agricultural education supply & demand study: 2023 executive summary. American Association for Agricultural Education. https://nsd.aaaeonline.org/Reports/2023%20NSD%20Executive%20Summary.pdf

Solomonson, J. K., Korte, D. S., Thieman, E. B., Retallick, M. S., & Keating, K. H. (2018). Factors contributing to Illinois school-based agriculture teachers’ final decision to leave the classroom. Journal of Agricultural Education, 59(2), 321–342. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2018.02321 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2018.02321

Solomonson, J. K., Still, S. M., & Maxwell, L. D. (2021). Factors influencing the decision of Illinois school-based agricultural education teachers to remain in the profession. Journal of Agricultural Education, 62(3), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2021.03121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2021.03121

Solomonson, J. K., Still, S. M., Maxwell, L. D., & Barrowclough, M. J. (2022). Exploring relationships between career retention factors and personal and professional characteristics of Illinois agriculture teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 63(2), 102–118. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2022.02119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2022.02119

Solomonson, J. K., Thieman, E. B., Korte, D. S., & Retallick, M. S. (2019). Why do they leave and where do they go? A qualitative study of Illinois school-based agriculture teachers who left the profession. Journal of Agricultural Education, 60(4), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2019.04115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2019.04115

Thyer, B. A. (2010). The handbook of social work research methods (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781544364902

Touchstone, A. J. L. (2015). Professional development needs of beginning agricultural education teachers in Idaho. Journal of Agricultural Education, 56(2), 170–187. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2015.02170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2015.02170

Traini, H. Q., Haddad, B., Stewart, J., & Velez, J. J. (2021). Adjusting, appeasing, and rearranging: How agriculture teachers reconcile demands of the profession. Journal of Agricultural Education, 62(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2021.02167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2021.02167

Vaidya, S. R., & Hanna, C. (2023). The four-capital theory as a framework for teacher retention and attrition. International Education Studies, 16(6), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v16n6p2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v16n6p21