Determining the Effectiveness of CASE Professional Development for CASE-certified Agricultural Education Teachers

Anna Bowser; Scott Smalley; Joe Ramstad

doi:10.5032/jae.v66i2.92

Authors

Anna Bowser Iowa State University
Scott Smalley Iowa State University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8386-4266
Joe Ramstad Iowa State University https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5594-399X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v66i2.92

Keywords:

Curriculum for Agricultural Science Education, Professional development, school based agricultural education

Abstract

The researchers analyzed the traditional Curriculum for Agricultural Science Education (CASE) Institute professional development (PD) program as professional development can change teacher practice and improve student achievement. Researchers used the Garet et al. study which outlined the relationship between the six effective features of professional development and teacher outcome as a framework to analyze the traditional CASE Institute professional development courses. Participants who were certified in a traditional CASE Institute professional development course were surveyed, and their responses were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) to determine the mean and standard deviation of the data related to the assessment of CASE professional development and the assessment of CASE lead teachers. These data were used to determine the effectiveness of the CASE professional development program. Their responses illustrated the effectiveness of CASE as they had a firm understanding of the material and CASE model, the comfortability of implementing the learned material in their classroom, and the effectiveness of their lead teachers based on their teaching abilities. The researchers also concluded that three of the six effective features of professional development examined in this study had a positive relationship between the features of the professional development and the participants’ responses. From the findings of this study, researchers created a list of recommendations and future research that should occur to bolster CASE Institute professional development courses and curriculum further.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Advance CTE. (2021). History of Advanced CTE. History of Advance CTE | Advance CTE. https://careertech.org/100yrs.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Irvine, C.K. S. (2018). Introduction to Research in Education (10th Edition). Cengage Learning US. https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/books/9781337671316

Asunda, P. A. (2012). Standards for technological literacy and STEM education delivery through career and technical education programs. Journal of Technology Education, 23(2). http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v23n2/asunda.html DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v23i2.a.3

Baker, M. A., Bunch, J., & Kelsey, K. D. (2015). An instrumental case study of effective science integration in a traditional agricultural education program. Journal of Agricultural Education, 56(1), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2015.01221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2015.01221

Bates, C.C., & Morgan, D.N. (2018). Seven elements of effective professional development. International Literacy Association. 71(5), 623–626. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1674 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1674

Bird, T. & Rice, A. (2021). The influence of CASE on agriculture teachers’ use of inquiry-based methods. Journal of Agricultural Education. 62(1), 260–275. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2021.01260 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2021.01260

Bragg, L. A., Walsh, C., & Heyeres, M. (2021). Successful design and delivery of online professional development for teachers: A systematic review of the literature. Computers & Education, 166, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104158

Carraway, C, Ulmer, J. D., Burris, S., & Irlbeck, E. (2015). Exploring science teachers’ perceptions of the Curriculum for Agricultural Science Education. Western American Association for Agricultural Education, Corvallis, OR, 223–267.

CASE. (2024-a). Curriculum. Curriculum for Agricultural Science Education. https://www.case4learning.org/curriculum/courses/

CASE. (2024-b). Mission and vision. Curriculum for Agricultural Science Education. https://www.case4learning.org/about-case/mission-and-vision/.

CASE. (2024-c). Professional development. Curriculum for Agricultural Science Education. https://www.case4learning.org/about-case/professional-development/.

CASE. (2024-d). Standards alignment. Curriculum for Agricultural Science Education. https://www.case4learning.org/curriculum/standards-alignment/

Castellano, M., Stringfield, S., & Stone, J. R. (2003). Secondary career and technical education and comprehensive school reform: Implications for research and practice. Review of Educational Research, 73(2), 231–272. https://doi.org/10.30102/00346543073002231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543073002231

Center for Educational Innovation. (n.d.). Active learning. University of Minnesota: Center for Educational Innovation. https://cei.umn.edu/active-learning.

Creswell, J. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications, Inc.

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311

Desimone, L. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher. 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140

Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394260645

Figland, W., Blackburn, D. J., Stair, D. K., & Smith, D. E. (2019). What do they need? Determining differences in the professional development needs of Louisiana agriculture teachers by years of teaching experience. Journal of Agricultural Education, 60(2), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2019.02173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2019.02173

Frontline Education. (2021, January 14). Timeline: History of professional learning: Education and technology. Frontline Education. https://www.frontlineeducation.com/solutions/professional-growth/insights/professional-learning-timeline/.

Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Birman, B., Yoon, K. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a National Sample of Teachers. American Education Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915

Ketelhut, D.J., Mills, K., Hestness, E., Cabrera, L., Plane, J., & McGinnis, J.R. (2019). Teacher change following a professional development experience in integrating computational thinking into elementary science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09798-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09798-4

Lambert, M.D., Velez, J.J., & Elliott, K.M. (2014). What are the teachers’ experiences when implementing the Curriculum for Agricultural Science Education? Journal of Agricultural Education, 55(4), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2014.04100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2014.04100

McKim, A., & McKim, L. K. (2023). Enhancing professional development by increasing agricultural educator margin. Journal of Agricultural Education, 64(3), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v64i3.48 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v64i3.48

Mizell, H. (2010). Why professional development matters. Learning Forward. ISBN 978-0-9800393-9-9.

Morey, T., Foster, D., & Ewing, J. (2023). Virtual mentoring in agricultural education: Describing digital literacy, technology self-efficacy, and attitudes toward technology of secondary agricultural educators. Journal of Agricultural Education, 64(1), 12–27. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v64i1.27 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v64i1.27

National Association of Agricultural Educators. (2021). What is agricultural education? National Association of Agricultural Educators. https://www.naae.org/whatisaged/.

NC State University. (n.d.). Curriculum for agricultural science education (CASE). Agricultural and Human Sciences. https://cals.ncsu.edu/agricultural-and-human-sciences/professional-development/curriculum-for-agricultural-science-case/#:~:text=The%20goal%20is%20to%20implement,mathematics%2C%20and%20English%20language%20understanding.

Nguyen, H. C. (2018). An investigation of professional development among educational policymakers, institutional leaders and teachers. Management in Education, 33(1), 32–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020618781678 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020618781678

Pauley, C.M., & McKim, A.J. (2019). Interdisciplinary Connections; Evaluating Collaboration between AFNR and Leadership, Mathematics, and Science Educators. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 8(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.32674/jise.v7i2.1084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32674/jise.v7i2.1084

Phipps, L. J., Osborne, E. W., Dyer, J. E., & Ball, A. (2008). Handbook on agricultural education in public schools (6th ed.). Thompson Delmar Learning.

Rice, A., Hasselquist, L., & Smalley, S. (2024). Lead teacher perspectives of virtual CASE Institute professional development. Journal of Agricultural Education, 65(3), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v65i3.104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v65i3.104

Sancar, R., Atal., D., & Deryakulu D., (2021). A new framework for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education. 101(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103305

Shoulders, C. & Myers, B. (2014). Effective professional development in agriscience education: An examination of core features. Journal of Agricultural Education. 55(1), 167–185. doi: 10.5032/jae.2014.01167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2014.01167

Smalley, S., Hainline, M., & Sands, K. (2019). School-based agricultural education teachers’ perceived professional development needs associated with teaching, classroom management, and technical agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Education. 60(2), 85–98. doi:10.5032/jae.2019.02085 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2019.02085

Smalley, S., Rice, A., & Hasselquist, L. (2023). The effectiveness of virtual CASE institute professional development: A participant perspective. Journal of Agricultural Education. 64(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v64i2.89 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v64i2.89

Smalley, S. W., & Smith, A. R. (2017). Professional development needs of mid-career agriculture teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 58(4), 282–290. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2017.04283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2017.04283

The National Council for Agricultural Education (2023). AFNR standards. https://thecouncil.ffa.org/afnr/

Thoron, A. C., Myers, B. E., & Barrick, R. K. (2016). Research priority 5: Efficient and effective agricultural education programs. In T. G. Roberts, A. Harder, & M. T. Brashears. (Eds.), American Association for Agricultural Education national research agenda: 2016-2020. Gainesville, FL: Department of Agricultural Education and Communication.

Thornton, K. M., Coleman, B. M., Bunch, J., & Roberts, T. G. (2020). Professional life phases: Identifying professional development needs for Florida agriscience teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 61(4), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.04283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.04283

Touchstone, A. J. L. (2015). Professional development needs of beginning agricultural education teachers in Idaho. Journal of Agricultural Education, 56(2), 170–187. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2015.02170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2015.02170

Tummons, J., Hasselquist, L., & Smalley, S. (2020). Exploring content, pedagogy, and literacy strategies among preservice teachers in CASE institutes. Journal of Agricultural Education, 61(2), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae/2020/02289 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.02289

U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Under Secretary. (2006). The study of professional development and teacher change: Building on national, cross-sectional finding with longitudinal data. The Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education. 28(2), 19–24.

Wood, M., Sorensen, T., & Rubenstein, E. (2024). Assessing the pedagogical content knowledge of school-based agricultural education teachers and determining their individualized need for professional development by licensure type. Journal of Agricultural Education, 65(2), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v65i2.119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v65i2.119

Yopp, A. M., Edgar, D., & Croom, D. B. (2020). Technical in-service needs of agriculture teachers in Georgia by career pathway. Journal of Agricultural Education, 61(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.02001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.02001