An Agricultural Literacy Assessment of Social Studies Teachers in South Carolina Participating in an Immersive Agricultural Experience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v66i3.2765Keywords:
Agricultural Literacy, Middle School, Career ExplorationAbstract
Studies in the career development of youth identify middle school as the optimum time for career exploration, as it advances young adolescents’ self-awareness, knowledge of prospective careers, and goal setting. In South Carolina, only 5% of public middle schools provide agricultural education. The purpose of this study was to measure the agricultural awareness and literacy impact of social studies teachers participating in a five-day study tour through mixed method procedures. A pre- and post-tour survey given to participants indicated a significant increase in knowledge and perception of agriculture after the tour. The qualitative analysis included collecting photographs and reflections from participants at the end of each tour day. A codebook was developed, and after three rounds of coding, the five themes that emerged from participants’ experiences were: 1) 21st-century agriculture production, 2) a need for agricultural literacy, 3) dissemination of information for greater agricultural literacy, 4) sustainable agricultural practices, and 5) the historical impact of agriculture. The major finding of this study was that the tour improved agricultural literacy. Participants recognized the extent of the agricultural knowledge they gained on the tour and described their intentions to enhance the social studies curriculum by exploring the state’s historical and contemporary agricultural systems.
Downloads
References
Baker, M. A., Culbertson, A. L., Robinson, J. S., & Ramsey, J. W. (2017). Seeing what they see--A photovoice analysis of exploratory early field experiences. Journal of Agricultural Education, 58(2), 252–267. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2017.0252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2017.0252
Borron, A. S. (2013). Picturing the underserved audience: Photovoice as method in applied communication research. Journal of Applied Communications, 97(4), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.1124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.1124
Clemons, C., Lindner, J. R., Murray, B., Cook, M. P., Sams, B., & Williams, G. (2018). Spanning the gap: The confluence of agricultural literacy and being agriculturally literate. Journal of Agricultural Education, 59(4), 238–252. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2018.04238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2018.04238
Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.78.1.98
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using SPSS (5th ed.). Sage.
Jones, K., Williams, R. J., & Gill, T. B. (2017). If you study, the last thing you want to be is working under the sun: An analysis of perceptions of agricultural education and occupations in four countries. Agriculture and Human Values, 34(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-016-9685-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-016-9685-4
Knobloch, N. A., Ball, A. L. (2003). An examination of elementary teachers’ and agricultural literacy coordinators’ beliefs related to the integration of agriculture. Agricultural Education Research Summary Report, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16867.353661.
Knobloch, N. A., Ball, A. L., & Allen, C. (2007). The benefits of teaching and learning about agriculture in elementary and junior high schools. Journal of Agricultural Education, 48(3), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2007.030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2007.03025
Knobloch, N. A. (2008). Factors of teacher beliefs related to integrating agriculture into elementary school classrooms. Agriculture and Human Values, 25(4), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-008-9135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-008-9135-z
Kovar, K. A., & Ball, A. L. (2013). Two decades of agricultural literacy research: A synthesis of the literature. Journal of Agricultural Education, 54(1), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2013.01167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2013.01167
Mars, M. M., & Ball, A. L. (2016). Ways of knowing, sharing, and translating agricultural knowledge and perspectives: Alternative epistemologies across non-formal and informal settings. Journal of Agricultural Education, 57(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2016.01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2016.01056
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Parker, J. E., & Wagner, D. J. (2016). From the USDA: Educating the next generation: Funding opportunities in food, agricultural, natural resources, and social sciences education. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(3), fe5. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0052
Perticara, L., & Swenson, R. D. (2019). Farm to classroom: Encouraging teachers’ infusion of agriculture following a farm tour. NACTA Journal, 63(2), 331–340. Retrieved from https://web.p.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=3&sid=cba58016-f59b-4aed-9fc9-d6f322c874ba%40redis&bdata=#AN=141616715&db=eft.
Powell, D., Agnew, D., & Trexler, C. (2008). Agricultural literacy: Clarifying a vision for practical application. Journal of Agricultural Education, 49(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2008.01085. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2008.01085
Richard, M.V., & Lahman, M.K.E. (2015). Photo-elicitation: Reflexivity on method, analysis, and graphic portraits. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38(1), 3–22, https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2013.843073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2013.843073
Saldaña, J. (2016). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage.
Sawilowsky, S (2009). New effect size rules of 0 thumb 2. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8(2), 467–474. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035100
South Carolina Department of Education. (2023). South Carolina Teachers by Race and Gender. https://ed.sc.gov/data/reports/scde-educator-profession-reports/scde-educator-profession-reports/sc-teachers-by-race-and-gender/
Vallera, F. L., & Bodzin, A. M. (2016). Knowledge, skills, or attitudes/beliefs: The contexts of agricultural literacy in upper-elementary science curricula. Journal of Agricultural Education, 57(4), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2016.04101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2016.04101