Exploring the Influence of Demographic Impact on Agricultural and Science Knowledge in Georgia

Maria Ramsey; Jessica Holt; Rachel Corry; Giavanna Gonsalves; Abigail Borron

doi:10.5032/jae.v66i2.2923

Authors

Maria A. Ramsey University of Georgia https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8747-7196
Jessica Holt University of Georgia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1295-0762
Rachel Corry Moore https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7654-6550
Giavanna Gonsalves BPI
Abigail Borron University of Georgia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9242-9570

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v66i2.2923

Keywords:

agricultural knowledge, science knowledge, demographic impact, assessment

Abstract

In an era marked by widespread access to information and debates over truth, the need for scientific and agricultural knowledge has become increasingly crucial. This study examined the demographic characteristics and baseline science and agricultural knowledge scores of respondents in Georgia using a non-probability, purposive sampling approach delivered through a Qualtrics survey. Results showed significant variation in science knowledge scores based on ethnicity, generational age, education, income, political ideology, and political affiliation, with higher scores among Boomers and the Silent Generation, individuals with graduate or professional degrees, and those with higher incomes. Gender differences in science knowledge were not statistically significant. Agricultural knowledge scores, however, varied significantly by gender, generational age, education, and political ideology. Female respondents, Boomers, and those with graduate or professional degrees scored highest, while no significant differences were observed based on ethnicity, income, or political affiliation. The findings highlight the importance of demographic factors in shaping science and agricultural literacy and emphasize the need for targeted educational policies and public outreach efforts. Addressing these disparities is critical for fostering a greater understanding of complex scientific and agricultural issues in society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brandt, M. R. (2016). Exploring elementary students’ agricultural and scientific knowledge using evidence-centered design [Doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln]. DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska-Lincoln. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natresdiss/131/

Burrows, M., Sorensen, T., & Spielmaker, D. (2020). Assessing the acceptance of incorporating agriculture into elementary school curriculum. Journal of Agricultural Education, 61(2), 358–370. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.02358 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.02358

Colby, S. L., & Ortman, J. M. (2015). Projections of the size and composition of the U.S. population: 2014 to 2060. United States Census Bureau. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED578934.pdf

Estepp, C. M., Wiersma-Mosley, J. D., & Shoulders, C. W. (2021). Examining undergraduate students’ intercultural competence in a teaching methods course. Journal of Agricultural Education, 62(4), 194–206. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2021.04191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2021.04191

Frick, M. J., Birkenholz, R. J., Gardner, H., & Machtmes, K. (1995). Rural and urban inner-city high school student knowledge and perception of agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Education, 36(4). https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.1995.04001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.1995.04001

Garbacz, M. (n.d.). What is science literacy and why is it important? Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources. https://sdn.unl.edu/article/what-science-literacy-and-why-it-important

Gibson, K. E., Lamm, A. J., & Lamm, K. W. (2020). Identifying audience needs to effectively communicate about the cost of implementing sustainable farming practices. Journal of Applied Communications, 104(3). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2334 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2334

Hand, S. S. (2020). Bridging the divide: Understanding the agricultural literacy of Georgia consumers [Master’s thesis, University of Georgia]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://esploro.libs.uga.edu/esploro/outputs/graduate/BRIDGING-THE-DIVIDE-UNDERSTANDING-THE-AGRICULTURAL/9949366055202959

Hess, A. J. (2011). A qualitative study of agricultural literacy in urban youth: What do elementary students understand about the agri-food system? Journal of Agricultural Education, 52(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2011.04001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2011.04001

Holt, J., Lamm, A.J., Gibson, K., Lamm, K., Ellis, J. & Rumble, J. (2020). Animating science communication: Measuring U.S. consumers’ recall about genetic modification with animated infographics. Journal of Applied Communications, 104(3). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2327

Howell, E. L., & Brossard, D. (2021). (Mis)informed about what? What it means to be a science-literate citizen in a digital world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(15). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912436117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912436117

Judd-Murray, M. (2019). Development and validation of an agricultural literacy instrument using the National Agricultural Literacy Outcomes [Doctoral dissertation, Utah State University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/development-validation-agricultural-literacy/docview/2292188673/se-2

Kovar, K. A., & Ball, A. L. (2013). Two decades of agricultural literacy research: A synthesis of the literature. Journal of Agricultural Education, 54(1), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2013.01167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2013.01167

Lamm, A. J., Gibson, K., Holt., J., Lamm, K., Ellis, J. & Rumble, J. N. (2020). Testing the impact of animating infographics on consumer trust and attitude when communication about Genetic Modification. Journal of Applied Communications, 104 (2). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2316

Lewis, M. L. (2018). Agricultural literacy among the generations: A national study. [Master’s thesis, Tennessee State University]. Digital Scholarship @ Tennessee State University. https://digitalscholarship.tnstate.edu/dissertations/AAI10751140

Martinez, M.A., Holt, J., Lamm, A.J., & Borron, A. (2021). Generation Z and CRISPR: Measuring information processing and using animated infographics. Journal of Applied Communications, 105(3). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2394 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2394

Mercer, B. (2021). Scientific literacy helps differentiate between science and pseudoscience. American Public University. https://apuedge.com/scientific-literacy-helps-differentiate-between-science-and-pseudoscience/

Mercier, S. (2018). How to address agricultural literacy—Start young. AgWeb. https://www.agweb.com/blog/straight-from-dc-agricultural-perspectives/how-to-address-agricultural-literacy-start-young

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Science literacy: Concepts, contexts, and consequences. National Academies Press. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/23595/science-literacy-concepts-contexts-and-consequences

National Center for Agricultural Literacy. (n.d.). Defining agricultural Literacy. https://www.agliteracy.org/research/defining/

National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/13165

National Science Board (2016). Science and Engineering Indicators 2016. National Science Foundation. https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/2016/nsb20161.pdf

National Science Board (2022). Science and Engineering Indicators 2022. National Science Foundation. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20221/

Noe-Bustamante, L., Lopez, M. H., & Krogstad, J. M. (2020). U.S. Hispanic population surpassed 60 million in 2019, but growth has slowed. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/07/07/u-s-hispanic-population-surpassed-60-million-in-2019-but-growth-has-slowed/

Pew Research Center. (2015). A look at what the public knows and does not know about science. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2015/09/10/what-the-public-knows-and-does-not-know-about-science/

Pew Research Center. (2023). Social media and news fact sheet. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/fact-sheet/social-media-and-news-fact-sheet/

Pew Research Center. (2019). What Americans Know About Science. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2019/03/28/what-americans-know-about-science/

Spielmaker, D. M., & Leising, J. G. (2013). National agricultural literacy outcomes. http://agclassroom.org/teacher/matrix

University of California Berkeley. (n.d.). Benefits of science. Understanding Science 101. https://undsci.berkeley.edu/understanding-science-101/how-science-works/benefits-of-science/

Vallera, F. L., & Bodzin, A. M. (2016). Knowledge, skills, or attitudes/beliefs: The contexts of agricultural literacy in upper-elementary science curricula. Journal of Agricultural Education, 57(4), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2016.04101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2016.04101

Whitehead, I. M., & Estepp, C. M. (2016). Agricultural Knowledge and Perceptions Among Students Enrolled in Agriscience Programs in Texas Counties Bordering Mexico. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 4(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.54718/GDXG8269 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54718/GDXG8269