Generation Z and CRISPR: Using the Theory of Planned Behavior to Study Voting Intention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v66i1.2470Keywords:
crispr, Generation Z, agricultural policy, voting intentions, educateAbstract
This study investigated Generation Z's (Gen Z) voting intentions regarding CRISPR-related regulation, utilizing the theory of planned behavior as the framework. Understanding the perceptions of CRISPR technology in this demographic is vital as Gen Z increasingly influences consumer behavior and policy decisions. A survey was conducted with first-year Gen Z college students, gathering data on attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and voting intentions after exposure to an infographic displaying CRISPR-related information. Results indicated a moderately positive attitude toward CRISPR technology, with participants expressing minimal social pressure from peers but a strong sense of control over their voting decisions. These findings underscore the importance of effective communication strategies tailored to Gen Z, highlighting the need for transparency and proactive engagement to foster acceptance of CRISPR innovations in agriculture. As CRISPR technology continues to evolve, agricultural communicators and policymakers must consider these insights to navigate the regulatory landscape and promote informed public discourse.
Downloads
References
Afify, M. (2018). The effect of the difference between infographic designing types (static vs animated) on developing visual learning designing skills and recognition of its elements and principles. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(9), 204–223. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i09.8541 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i09.8541
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Ajzen, I. (1998). Models of human social behavior and their application to health psychology. Psychology and health, 13(4), 735–739. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08870449808407426
Ajzen, I. (2006). Constructing a theory of planned behavior questionnaire. https://people.umass.edu/~aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf
Ajzen, I. (2016). Consumer attitudes and behavior: The theory of planned behavior applied to food consumption decisions. Italian Review of Agriculture Economics, 70(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.13128/REA-18003
Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Publons. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195
Antonopoulou, L., Papadas, T. C., & Targoutzidis, A. (2009). The impact of socio-demographic factors and political perceptions on consumer attitudes towards genetically modified food: An econometric investigation. Agricultural Economics Review, 10(2).
Bickell, E. G. (2023). Gene-edited plants: Regulation and issues for Congress (CRS Report No. R47683). Congressional Research Service. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R47683/2
Brosig, S., & Bavorova, M. (2019). Association of attitudes towards genetically modified food among young adults and their referent persons. PLoS ONE, 14(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211879 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211879
Brown, B. (2023). Pairwise introduces Conscious™ greens into U.S. restaurants. Pairwise. https://www.pairwise.com/news/pairwise-introduces-conscious-greens-into-u.s.-restaurants
Burnett, E., Holt, J., Borron, A., & Wojdynski, B. (2019). Interactive infographics’ effect on elaboration in agriculture communication. Journal of Applied Communications, 103(3). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2272
Business Wire. (2019). First commercial sale of Calyxt high oleic soybean oil on the U.S. market. Business Wire. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20190226006176/en/First-Commercial-Sale-of-Calyxt-High-Oleic-Soybean-Oil-on-the-U.S.-Market
Crawford, M. (2017). 8 ways CRISPR-Cas9 can change the world. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://www.asme.org/topics-resources/content/8-ways-crisprcas9-can-change-world
Cook, A. J., Kerr, G. N., & Moore, K. (2002). Attitudes and intentions towards purchasing GM food. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 557–572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00117-4
Diamond, E., Bernauer, T., & Mayer, F. (2020). Does providing scientific information affect climate change and GMO policy preferences of the mass public? Insights from survey experiments in Germany and the United States. Environmental Politics, 29(6), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1740547 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1740547
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394260645
Entine, J., Felipe, M. S. S., Groenewald, J. H., Kershen, D. L., Lema, M., McHughen, A., Nepomuceno, A. L., Ohsawa, R., Ordonio, R. L., Parrott, W. A., Quemada, H., Ramage, C., Slamet-Loedin, I., Smyth, S. J., & Wray-Cahen, D. (2021). Regulatory approaches for genome edited agricultural plants in select countries and jurisdictions around the world. Transgenic Research, 30(4), 551–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-021-00257-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-021-00257-8
Feger, A. (2024). Guide to Gen Z: What matters to this generation and what it means for marketers. eMarketer. https://www.emarketer.com/insights/generation-z-facts/
Funk, C., & Rainie, L. (2015). Public and scientists’ views on science and society. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2015/01/29/public-and-scientists-views-on-science-and-society/
Gao, C. (2018). The future of CRISPR technologies in agriculture. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 19(5), 275–276. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2018.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2018.2
Giblin, R. (2019, February 6). Is U.S. agriculture ready for Generation Z? Farm Bureau. https://www.fb.org/viewpoints/is-u.s.-agriculture-ready-for-generation-z
Giovannoni, J., Nguyen, C., Ampofo, B., Zhong, S., & Fei, Z. (2018). The epigenome and transcriptional dynamics of fruit ripening. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 68, 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040223 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042916-040906
Hansen, T., & Jensen, J. (2007). Understanding voters’ decisions: A theory of planned behavior approach. Innovative Marketing, 3(4), 87–94. https://businessperspectives.org/images/pdf/applications/publishing/templates/article/assets/1971/im_en_2007_04_Hansen.pdf
Haskell, S. (2020). CRISPR and our food supply: What’s next in feeding the world? Michigan State University. https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/crispr-and-our-food-supply-what-s-next-in-feeding-the-world
Hess, J. A. (2020, November 28). The 2020 election shows Gen Z’s voting power for years to come. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/18/the-2020-election-shows-gen-zs-voting-power-for-years-to-come.html
Holt, J., Lamm, A. J., Gibson, K., Lamm, K., Ellis, J., & Rumble, J. (2020). Animating science communication: Measuring U.S. consumers’ recall about genetic modification with animated infographics. Journal of Applied Communications, 104(3). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2327
Ibrahim, A., Knox, K., Rundel-Thiele, S., & Arli, D. (2018). Segmenting a water use market: Theory of interpersonal behavior insights. Social Marketing Quarterly, 24, 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500417741277 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500417741277
Institute of Business Management. (2017). Uniquely Generation Z. Institute of Business Management. https://www.generationy20.com/retail-generation-z.PDF
Karavolias, N. (2022). CRISPR in agriculture: 2022 in review. Innovative Genomics Institute. https://innovativegenomics.org/news/crispr-agriculture-2022/
Kelleher, C., & Wagener, T. (2011). Ten guidelines for effective data visualization in scientific publications. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26(6), 822–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.12.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.12.006
Lamm, A. J., Gibson, K., Holt, J., Lamm, K., Ellis, J., & Rumble, J. N. (2020). Testing the impact of animating infographics on consumer trust and attitude when communicating about genetic modification. Journal of Applied Communications, 104(2). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2316
Lang, J. (2013). Elements of public trust in the American food system: Experts, organizations, and genetically modified food. Food Policy, 41, 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.05.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.05.008
Li, N., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Wilson, P. H., & Rose, K. M. (2018). Communicating data: Interactive infographics, scientific data, and credibility. Journal of Science Communication, 17(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.17020206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22323/2.17020206
Martinez, M. A., Holt, J., Lamm, A., & Borron, A. (2021). Generation Z and CRISPR: Measuring information processing using animated infographics. Journal of Applied Communications, 105(3). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2394 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2394
Meyer, A., & Dastgheib-Vinarov, S. (2021). The future of food: CRISPR-edited agriculture. Food & Drug Law Institute. https://www.fdli.org/2021/11/the-future-of-food-crispr-edited-agriculture/
Mir, T. u. G., Wani, A. K., Akhtar, N., & Shukla, S. (2022). CRISPR/Cas9: Regulations and challenges for law enforcement to combat its dual-use. Forensic Science International, 334, 111–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111274
Napier, L. T., Tucker, M., Henry, C., & Whaley, R. S. (2004). Consumer attitudes toward GMOs: The Ohio experience. Journal of Food Science, 69(6), 275–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.tb13344.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.tb13344.x
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Genetically engineered crops: Experiences and prospects - New report.
Otten, J. J., Cheng, K., & Drewnowski, A. (2015). Infographics and public policy: Using data visualization to convey complex information. Health Affairs, 34(11), 1901–1907. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0642https://www.nationalacademies.org/news/2016/05/genetically-engineered-crops-experiences-and-prospects-new-report DOI: https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0642
Pew Research Center. (2019). Generation Z looks a lot like Millennials on key social and political issues. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2019/01/17/generation-z-looks-a-lot-like-millennials-on-key-social-and-political-issues/
Pew Research Center. (2020). On the cusp of adulthood and facing an uncertain future: What we know about Gen Z so far. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/essay/on-the-cusp-of-adulthood-and-facing-an-uncertain-future-what-we-know-about-gen-z-so-far/
Rasheed, A., Gill, R. A., Hassan, M. U., Mahmood, A., Qari, S., Zaman, Q. U., Ilyas, M., Aamer, M., Batool, M., Li, H., & Wu, Z. (2021). A critical review: Recent advancements in the use of CRISPR/Cas9 technology to enhance crops and alleviate global food crises. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 43(3), 1950–1976. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb43030135 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb43030135
Rizvanović, B., Zutshi, A., Grilo, A., & Nodehi, T. (2023). Linking the potentials of extended digital marketing impact and start-up growth: Developing a macro-dynamic framework of start-up growth drivers supported by digital marketing. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 186(A), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122128
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). Simon & Schuster.
Ruth, T. K. (2018). A grounded theory approach to understanding the factors that influence tenure-track, UF/IFAS faculty's engagement in science communication (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Florida.
Saba, A., & Vassallo, M. (2002). Consumer attitudes toward the use of gene technology in tomato production. Food Quality and Preference, 13, 13–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(01)00052-0
Spence, A., & Townsend, E. (2006). Implicit attitudes towards genetically modified (GM) foods: A comparison of context-free and context-dependent evaluations. Appetite, 46(1), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2005.09.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2005.09.003
Sparks, P., Shepherd, R., & Frewer, L. (1995). Assessing and structuring attitudes toward the use of gene technology in food production: The role of perceived ethical obligation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 16(3), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1603_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1603_1
Taylor, K. (2019). Instagram is Gen Z’s go-to source of political news – and it’s already having an impact on the 2020 election. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/gen-z-gets-its-political-news-from-instagram-accounts-2019-6
The International Council of Shopping Centers. (2023). The rise of the Gen Z consumer. ICSC. https://www.icsc.com/news-and-views/icsc-exchange/the-rise-of-the-gen-z-consumer
The Media Insight Project. (2022). The news consumption habits of 16- to 40-year-olds. American Press Institute. https://americanpressinstitute.org/the-news-consumption-habits-of-16-to-40-year-olds/
The White House. (2023). Executive Order 14081: Advancing biotechnology and biomanufacturing innovation for a sustainable, safe, and secure bioeconomy. Federal Register. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/04/27/2023-08841/executive-order-14081-advancing-biotechnology-and-biomanufacturing-innovation-for-a-sustainable-safe
Thomas, M. (2024). Where does Gen Z spend most of their time online? Later Social Media Management. https://later.com/blog/gen-z-social-media-usage/
Townsend, E., & Campbell, S. (2006). Psychological determinants of willingness to taste and purchase GM food. Risk Analysis, 24(6), 1385–1393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00873.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00533.x
Tufts. (2020). Election week 2020: Young people increase turnout, lead Biden to victory. Circle Tufts. https://circle.tufts.edu/latest-research/election-week-2020#youthvoting:-state-by-state
Tufts. (2023). The youth vote in 2022. Tufts University. https://circle.tufts.edu/2022-election-center#youth-turnout-second-highest-in-last-three-decades
Turner, A. (2015). Generation Z: Technology and social interest. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 71(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1353/jip.2015.0021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jip.2015.0021
U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2019). Executive Order 13874, modernizing the regulatory framework for agricultural biotechnology products. 84 Federal Register 27899. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/06/14/2019-12802/modernizing-the-regulatory-framework-for-agricultural-biotechnology-products
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2023). Pesticides; exemptions of certain plant-incorporated protectants (PIPs) derived from newer technologies - final rule. Federal Register. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/05/09/2023-09542/notification-of-submission-to-the-secretary-of-agriculture-pesticides-exemptions-of-certain
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2023). Guidance for industry: Foods derived from plants produced using genome editing. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/guidance-industry-foods-derived-plants-produced-using-genome-editing
Warner, L. A. (2019). Using homeowners' association membership to define audience segments for targeted local social marketing interventions: Implications from a statewide study. Social Marketing Quarterly, 25(4), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500419882978 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500419882978
Watters, A. E. (1989). Reasoned/intuitive action: An individual difference moderator of the attitude-behavior relationship in the 1988 U.S. presidential election. Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. https://doi.org/10.7275/15793451
Wenham, L. (2023). CRISPR in agriculture: Applications, benefits & risks. Automata. https://automata.tech/en-US/blog/crispr-agriculture/
Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2014). Mass media research: An introduction (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
