Conceptualizing Curriculum Planning: Analyzing Agricultural Educators’ Instructional Planning Processes

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v67i1.3284

Keywords:

Curriculum Planning, Pedagogical Design Capacity, Conceptual Content Cognitive Mapping (3CM)

Abstract

Instructional planning is a complex process that requires school-based agricultural education (SBAE) teachers to balance student needs, curricular demands, and contextual factors such as FFA activities and local industry requirements. This study examined how SBAE teachers conceptualize instructional planning using Conceptual Content Cognitive Mapping (3CM) and follow-up interviews. Fifty teachers participated in a card-sorting activity that generated composite mental models of instructional planning, then  three teachers engaged in semi-structured interviews to elaborate on their decision-making processes. Analysis of the composite maps revealed six clusters of thought that structure teachers’ cognitive models: curriculum guides, resources, evidence of learning, instructional methods, student prior experience, and considerations and context. Interview data further illuminated five themes shaping teachers’ practices: backward design, flexible instructional design, use of resources and tools, differentiation, and embedded teaching philosophies. These themes closely aligned with and elaborated on the clusters identified in the mental model, illustrating how teachers integrate curricular structures, contextual demands, and student-centered approaches in planning instruction. Findings highlight the pedagogical design capacity of SBAE teachers, demonstrating both structured frameworks and adaptive strategies in instructional planning. Implications suggest that professional development should support teachers in making their philosophies explicit, strengthening backward design practices, and enhancing flexibility to meet contextual demands. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of instructional planning in SBAE and informs efforts to improve teacher preparation and support.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ball, A. L., Knobloch, N. A., & Hoop, S. (2007). The instructional planning experiences of beginning teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 48(2), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2007.02056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2007.02056

Borgatti, S. (1992). Anthropac (4.0) [Computer software]. Analytic Technologies. http://www.analytictech.com/anthropac/anthropac.htm

Brown, M. (2009). The teacher-tool relationship. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17–36). Routledge.

Brown, M. & Edelson, D. C. (2003). Teaching as design: Can we better understand the ways in which teachers use materials so that we can better design materials to support their changes in practice? The Center for Learning Technologies in Urban Schools.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.

Dormody, T. J., Skelton, P., Rodriguez, G., Dubois, D. W., & VanLeeuwen, D. (2021). Assessing the impact of weather and climate curriculum on youth science comprehension. Journal of Agricultural Education, 62(3), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2021.03153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2021.03153

Doss, W., Rayfield, J., & Lawver, D. (2023). A national study assessing the influence of perceived challenges faced by school-based agricultural education teachers on their ability to do their job. Journal of Agricultural Education, 64(3), 184–202. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v64i3.2476 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v64i3.2476

Easterly III, R. G., & Barry, D. M. (2022). Curricular resource use and pedagogical design capacity of Florida agricultural education teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 63(3), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2022.03059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2022.03059

Easterly III, R. G. & Simpson, K. A. (2020). An examination of the curricular resource use and self- efficacy of Utah school-based agricultural education teachers: An exploratory study. Journal of Agricultural Education, 61(4), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.04030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.04030

Ellingson, C. (2018). Teachers as curriculum designers: Understanding STEM pedagogical design capacity. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy, http://hdl.handle.net/11299/199085.

Fessler, R. & Christensen, J. C. (1992). The teacher career cycle: Understanding and guiding the professional development of teachers. Allyn and Bacon.

Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative inquiry. Wiedenfeld. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014

Hall, B. M., Easterly III, R. G., & Barry, D. M. (2022). A comparison of curricular resource use of Florida school-based agricultural education teachers by career stage. Journal of Agricultural Education, 63(4), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2022.04232 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2022.04232

Handwerker, W. P., & Wozniak, D. F. (1997). Sampling strategies for the collection of cultural data: An extension of Boas’s answer to Galton’s problem. Current Anthropology, 28(5), 869–875. https://doi.org/10.1086/204675 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/204675

Kearney, A. R. (2015). 3CM: A tool for knowing "where they're at". In R. Kaplan, & A. Basu (Eds.), Fostering reasonableness: Supportive environments for bringing out our best (pp. 273–294). Michigan Publishing.

Knight-Bardsley, A., & McNeill, K. (2016). Teachers' pedagogical design capacity or scientific argumentation. Science Education, 100(4), 645–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21222 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21222

Lambert, M. D., Velez, J. J., & Elliot, K. M. (2014). What are the teachers' experiences when implementing the curriculum for agricultural science education? Journal of Agricultural Education, 55(4), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2014.04100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2014.04100

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75). Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

Main, P. (2022). Cognitive load theory: A teacher's guide. https://www.structural-learning.com/post/cognitive-load-theory-a-teachers-guide

Marzano, R. J. (2007). The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for effective instruction. ASCD.

Meder, A., Smalley, S., & Retallick, M. (2018). Evaluating first year agriculture teachers’ use of reflection. Journal of Agricultural Education, 59(2), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2018.02289 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2018.02289

Myers, B. E., Dyer, J. E., & Washburn, S. G. (2005). Problems facing beginning agriculture teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 46(3), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2005.03047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2005.03047

Rice, A. H., & Kitchel, T. (2016). Deconstructing content knowledge: Coping strategies and their underlying influencers for beginning agriculture teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 57(3), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2016.03208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2016.03208

Rice, A. H., & Kitchel, T. (2017). Teachers' beliefs about the purpose of agricultural education and its influence on their pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Agricultural Education, 58(2), 198–213. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2017.02198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2017.02198

Roberts, T. G., & Dyer, J. E. (2004). Characteristics of effective agriculture teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 45(4), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2004.04082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2004.04082

Shoulders, C. W., & Myers, B. E. (2011). Considering professional identity to enhance agriculture teacher development. Journal of Agricultural Education, 52(4), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2011.04098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2011.04098

Shoulders, C. W., & Myers, B. E. (2013). Socioscientific issues-based instruction: An investigation of agriscience students' content knowledge based on student variables. Journal of Agricultural Education, 54(3), 140–156. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2013.03140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2013.03140

Thornton, K., Easterly III, R. G., & Simpson, K. A. (2020). Curricular resource use and the relationship with teacher self-efficacy among New Mexico school-based agricultural education teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 61(4), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.04343 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.04343

Thornton, S. J. (2005). Teaching social studies that matters. Teachers College Press.

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (Expanded 2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Downloads

Published

02/11/2026

How to Cite

Dossett, J., Hundemer, S., Easterly III, R. (Tre), & Bunch, J. C. (2026). Conceptualizing Curriculum Planning: Analyzing Agricultural Educators’ Instructional Planning Processes. Journal of Agricultural Education, 67(1), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v67i1.3284

Issue

Section

Journal of Agricultural Education

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>