Conceptualizing Curriculum Planning: Analyzing Agricultural Educators’ Instructional Planning Processes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v67i1.3284Keywords:
Curriculum Planning, Pedagogical Design Capacity, Conceptual Content Cognitive Mapping (3CM)Abstract
Instructional planning is a complex process that requires school-based agricultural education (SBAE) teachers to balance student needs, curricular demands, and contextual factors such as FFA activities and local industry requirements. This study examined how SBAE teachers conceptualize instructional planning using Conceptual Content Cognitive Mapping (3CM) and follow-up interviews. Fifty teachers participated in a card-sorting activity that generated composite mental models of instructional planning, then three teachers engaged in semi-structured interviews to elaborate on their decision-making processes. Analysis of the composite maps revealed six clusters of thought that structure teachers’ cognitive models: curriculum guides, resources, evidence of learning, instructional methods, student prior experience, and considerations and context. Interview data further illuminated five themes shaping teachers’ practices: backward design, flexible instructional design, use of resources and tools, differentiation, and embedded teaching philosophies. These themes closely aligned with and elaborated on the clusters identified in the mental model, illustrating how teachers integrate curricular structures, contextual demands, and student-centered approaches in planning instruction. Findings highlight the pedagogical design capacity of SBAE teachers, demonstrating both structured frameworks and adaptive strategies in instructional planning. Implications suggest that professional development should support teachers in making their philosophies explicit, strengthening backward design practices, and enhancing flexibility to meet contextual demands. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of instructional planning in SBAE and informs efforts to improve teacher preparation and support.
Downloads
References
Ball, A. L., Knobloch, N. A., & Hoop, S. (2007). The instructional planning experiences of beginning teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 48(2), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2007.02056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2007.02056
Borgatti, S. (1992). Anthropac (4.0) [Computer software]. Analytic Technologies. http://www.analytictech.com/anthropac/anthropac.htm
Brown, M. (2009). The teacher-tool relationship. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17–36). Routledge.
Brown, M. & Edelson, D. C. (2003). Teaching as design: Can we better understand the ways in which teachers use materials so that we can better design materials to support their changes in practice? The Center for Learning Technologies in Urban Schools.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
Dormody, T. J., Skelton, P., Rodriguez, G., Dubois, D. W., & VanLeeuwen, D. (2021). Assessing the impact of weather and climate curriculum on youth science comprehension. Journal of Agricultural Education, 62(3), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2021.03153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2021.03153
Doss, W., Rayfield, J., & Lawver, D. (2023). A national study assessing the influence of perceived challenges faced by school-based agricultural education teachers on their ability to do their job. Journal of Agricultural Education, 64(3), 184–202. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v64i3.2476 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v64i3.2476
Easterly III, R. G., & Barry, D. M. (2022). Curricular resource use and pedagogical design capacity of Florida agricultural education teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 63(3), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2022.03059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2022.03059
Easterly III, R. G. & Simpson, K. A. (2020). An examination of the curricular resource use and self- efficacy of Utah school-based agricultural education teachers: An exploratory study. Journal of Agricultural Education, 61(4), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.04030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.04030
Ellingson, C. (2018). Teachers as curriculum designers: Understanding STEM pedagogical design capacity. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy, http://hdl.handle.net/11299/199085.
Fessler, R. & Christensen, J. C. (1992). The teacher career cycle: Understanding and guiding the professional development of teachers. Allyn and Bacon.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative inquiry. Wiedenfeld. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014
Hall, B. M., Easterly III, R. G., & Barry, D. M. (2022). A comparison of curricular resource use of Florida school-based agricultural education teachers by career stage. Journal of Agricultural Education, 63(4), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2022.04232 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2022.04232
Handwerker, W. P., & Wozniak, D. F. (1997). Sampling strategies for the collection of cultural data: An extension of Boas’s answer to Galton’s problem. Current Anthropology, 28(5), 869–875. https://doi.org/10.1086/204675 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/204675
Kearney, A. R. (2015). 3CM: A tool for knowing "where they're at". In R. Kaplan, & A. Basu (Eds.), Fostering reasonableness: Supportive environments for bringing out our best (pp. 273–294). Michigan Publishing.
Knight-Bardsley, A., & McNeill, K. (2016). Teachers' pedagogical design capacity or scientific argumentation. Science Education, 100(4), 645–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21222 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21222
Lambert, M. D., Velez, J. J., & Elliot, K. M. (2014). What are the teachers' experiences when implementing the curriculum for agricultural science education? Journal of Agricultural Education, 55(4), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2014.04100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2014.04100
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75). Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
Main, P. (2022). Cognitive load theory: A teacher's guide. https://www.structural-learning.com/post/cognitive-load-theory-a-teachers-guide
Marzano, R. J. (2007). The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for effective instruction. ASCD.
Meder, A., Smalley, S., & Retallick, M. (2018). Evaluating first year agriculture teachers’ use of reflection. Journal of Agricultural Education, 59(2), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2018.02289 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2018.02289
Myers, B. E., Dyer, J. E., & Washburn, S. G. (2005). Problems facing beginning agriculture teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 46(3), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2005.03047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2005.03047
Rice, A. H., & Kitchel, T. (2016). Deconstructing content knowledge: Coping strategies and their underlying influencers for beginning agriculture teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 57(3), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2016.03208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2016.03208
Rice, A. H., & Kitchel, T. (2017). Teachers' beliefs about the purpose of agricultural education and its influence on their pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Agricultural Education, 58(2), 198–213. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2017.02198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2017.02198
Roberts, T. G., & Dyer, J. E. (2004). Characteristics of effective agriculture teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 45(4), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2004.04082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2004.04082
Shoulders, C. W., & Myers, B. E. (2011). Considering professional identity to enhance agriculture teacher development. Journal of Agricultural Education, 52(4), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2011.04098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2011.04098
Shoulders, C. W., & Myers, B. E. (2013). Socioscientific issues-based instruction: An investigation of agriscience students' content knowledge based on student variables. Journal of Agricultural Education, 54(3), 140–156. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2013.03140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2013.03140
Thornton, K., Easterly III, R. G., & Simpson, K. A. (2020). Curricular resource use and the relationship with teacher self-efficacy among New Mexico school-based agricultural education teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 61(4), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.04343 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.04343
Thornton, S. J. (2005). Teaching social studies that matters. Teachers College Press.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (Expanded 2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.