A Qualitative Study of Factors Influencing Teaching Self-Efficacy of Elementary Agricultural Education Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v66i2.2779Keywords:
elementary agricultural education, teaching self-efficacy, triadic reciprocal determinism, phenomenology, hermeneutic circleAbstract
In the realm of elementary agricultural education (EAE), the self-efficacy of educators plays a pivotal role in shaping both their pedagogical practices and self-concept. Grounded in constructivist theory and employing a phenomenological approach, this study investigated the factors influencing EAE teaching self-efficacy. At the time of the study, there were a total of 30 EAE teachers in Georgia. To gain an in-depth understanding, all 30 teachers with diverse backgrounds and teaching experiences were invited to participate. Of these, 18 consented, providing a rich sample for analysis. However, the decision to select 12 participants was influenced by the available time for conducting the focus group sessions and their current teaching responsibilities. Focus group sessions were conducted, with participants stratified by self-efficacy scores. Preliminary analyses dictated the threshold criteria for Focus Group 1 (scores ≤ 7) and Focus Group 2 (scores ≥ 8). Anchored in Bandura’s (1986) triadic reciprocal determinism, the research accentuated the dynamic interaction among environmental stimuli, agricultural convictions, and behavior. Three key determinants emerged as influential to EAE teaching efficacy: personal values, boundary-breaking behaviors, and positive school culture. These determinants foster an EAE environment characterized by affective actions, contagious behaviors, and a constructive attitude. Given the implications of these findings, continuous and iterative evaluations of the EAE curriculum are paramount in educational research.
Downloads
References
Archibald, M., Ambagtsheer, R., Casey, M., & Lawless, M. (2019). Using Zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: Perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919874596 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919874596
Baker, E. A. (2022). Crafting qualitative research questions: A prequel to design. SAGE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071938935
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.
Bans-Akutey, A., & Tiimub, B. M. (2021). Triangulation in Research. Academia Letters. Article 3392. https://doi.org/10.20935/al3392 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20935/AL3392
Bergen, N., & Labonté, R. (2019). “Everything Is Perfect, and We Have No Problems”: Detecting and Limiting Social Desirability Bias in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Health Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319889354 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319889354
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Research designs (Vol. 2, pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
Braun, V. & Clarke, V., (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. SAGE
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019b). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health, 13(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676x.2019.1704846 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846
Bruce, C.D., Esmonde, I., Ross, J., Dookie, L., & Beatty, R. (2010). The effects of sustained classroom-embedded teacher professional learning on teacher efficacy and related student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1598–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.011
Cheng, K.-W. (2007). A study on applying focus group interview on education. Reading Improvement, 44(4), 194+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A175631370/AONE?u=uga&sid=googleScholar&xid=317dafae
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, W., & Poth, N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.
Delinger, A., Bobbett, J., Olivier, D., & Ellett, C. (2008). Measuring teacher’s self-efficacy beliefs: Development and use of the TEBS-Self. Teaching and Teacher Education 24(2008), 751–766. https://doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.02.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.02.010
Dipabile, W. (2012). A review of literature on teacher efficacy and classroom management. Educational Psychology & Counseling Publications and Other Works, 9(2), 79–92. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_educpubs/31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v9i2.6902
Dishon-Berkovits, M. (2019). The role of general self-efficacy in work-family compensation and satisfaction - Current Psychology. SpringerLink. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00469-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00469-6
Elliott, V. (2018). Thinking about the coding process in qualitative data analysis. The Qualitative Report, 23(11), 2850–2861. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol23/iss11/14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3560
Faitar G., & Faitar, S. (2013). Teacher’s influence on students’ science career choices. American International Journal of Social Science 2(5), 10–16. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=175a3590f929ffbe05a9d8cbb7fc22a181093931
Gadamer, H.‐G. (1990) Truth and method (2nd ed.). Crossroad.
Grondin, J. (2015). The hermeneutical circle. A Companion to Hermeneutics, 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118529812.ch34 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118529812.ch34
HB 1303 Georgia House. (2022). Open states. (n.d.). https://openstates.org/ga/bills/2021_22/HB1303/.
Heidegger, M. (1927) Being and time (Trans. J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson). Blackwell.
Helm, M., Fuhrman, N. & Peake, J. (2024, February 3-5). A study on preservice teachers’ self-efficacy and challenges in greenhouse management [Poster presentation]. Southern Region American Association for Agricultural Education. Atlanta, Georgia USA.
Holzberger, D., Philipp, A., & Kunter, M. (2013). How teachers’ self-efficacy is related to instructional quality: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 774–786. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032198
Jensen, B., Sonnemann, J., Roberts-Hull, K., & Hunter, A. (2016). Beyond PD: Teacher professional learning in high-performing systems. National Center on Education and the Economy.
Klassen, R., & Tze, V. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12(June 2014), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.06.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.06.001
Krieger, S. (1991). Social science and the self: Personal essays on an art form. Rutgers University Press.
Low, J. (2019). A pragmatic definition of the concept of theoretical saturation. Sociological Focus, 52(2), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2018.1544514 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2018.1544514
Majid, M. A. A., Othman, M., Mohamad, S. F., Lim, S. A. H., & Yusof, A. (2017). Piloting for interviews in qualitative research: Operationalization and lessons learnt. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(4), 1073–1080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i4/2916
Martinez, C. (2022). Developing 21st Century teaching skills: A case study of teaching and learning through project-based curriculum. Cogent Education, 9(1), 1–16 https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2021.2024936 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.2024936
Massey, O. T. (2011). A proposed model for the analysis and interpretation of focus groups in evaluation research. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.06.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.06.003
McKibben, J. D., Clemons, C. A., & Nurradin, M. (2022). Hybrid vigor: A quantitative analysis of job satisfaction of United States school based secondary agricultural education classrooms. Journal of Agricultural Education, 63(2), 238–250. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2022.02238 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2022.02238
Natow, R. S. (2019). The use of triangulation in qualitative studies employing elite interviews. Qualitative Research, 20(2), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119830077 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119830077
O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020 ). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 160940691989922. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
Roberts, T. G., Harder, A., & Brashears, M. T. (Eds). (2016). American Association for Agricultural Education national research agenda: 2016-2020. http://aaaeonline.org/resources/Documents/AAAE_National_Research_Agenda_2016-2020.pdf
Roulston, K. (2022). Interviewing: A guide to theory and practice. SAGE
Rowston, K., Bower, M., & Woodcock, S. (2021). Reciprocal causation and the effect of environmental determinants upon the technology beliefs and practice of career-change pre-service teachers. Technology, Pedagogy, and Education 30(2), 323–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2021.1879925 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2021.1879925
Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1525822X02239569 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239569
Scherf, R., & Bye, C. (2017). Multi-sensory practices for all: Changing physiology, behavior, and performance. In W. Steele (Ed.), Optimizing Learning Outcomes (pp. 58–73). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315563565-4
Schunk, D.H. (2020). Learning theories: An educational perspective (8th ed.). Pearson Education Inc.
Schunk, D., & DiBenedetto, M. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology 60(2020), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
Sheehan, C. Z., & Moore, L. L. (2019). Teacher self-efficacy in SBAE methods coursework: A mixed methods Study. Journal of Agricultural Education, 60(3), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2019.03219 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2019.03219
Swaminathan, R., & Mulvihil, T.M. (2018). Teaching qualitative research: Strategies for engaging emerging scholars. The Guilford Press.
Talbert, B.A., Croom, B., LaRose, S.E., Vaughn, R., & Lee, J.S. (2022). Foundations of agricultural education (4th ed.) Purdue University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1zjgbnr
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 944–956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003
Tschannen‐Moran, M., & McMaster, P. (2009). Sources of self‐efficacy: Four professional development formats and their relationship to self‐efficacy and implementation of a new teaching strategy. The Elementary School Journal, 110(2), 228–245. https://doi.org/10.1086/605771 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/605771
VERBI Software. (2022). MAXQDA 2022 [computer software]. Berlin, Germany: VERBI Software. Available from maxqda.com
Vila-Henninger, L., Dupuy, C., Van Ingelgom, V., Caprioli, M., Teuber, F., Pennetreau, D., Bussi, M., & Le Gall, C. (2022). Abductive coding: Theory building and qualitative (Re)Analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 004912412110675. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241211067508 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241211067508
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
