Comparing Content and Pedagogical Knowledge of Alternatively and Traditionally Certified Agricultural Educators
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v66i3.2396Keywords:
alternative certification, PCK, content knowledge, teacher certificationAbstract
Agricultural Education faces continued challenges of filling open positions, and as a result, many states have expanded alternative certification pathways as a means of alleviating the problem. Typically, alternatively certified teachers are experts in their specific industry within agriculture but lack the pedagogical preparation that comes from a traditional post-secondary teacher preparation program. School districts must look at the classroom and professional needs of alternatively certified teachers compared to those of their traditionally certified colleagues for all educators to be successful in the classroom and to remain in the classroom for the long haul. This descriptive-relational study utilized teacher responses to a digital questionnaire distributed to school-based agricultural education (SBAE) teachers in 12 states. Traditionally certified teachers and alternatively certified teachers answered Likert-type questions related to their perceived Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) in designing and implementing lessons in an agricultural education classroom, as well as various classroom management strategies. The findings indicate that within the Knowledge of Content and Teaching construct of PCK, alternatively certified teachers may experience more difficulty in implementing various questioning strategies to help students understand complex agricultural concepts. Related to classroom management strategies, statistically significant differences were observed in “planning for each period” and in “teaching procedures and routines” when comparing alternatively and traditionally certified agricultural education teachers. Recommendations include that school districts create and implement targeted professional development opportunities for alternatively certified teachers on questioning techniques, effective lesson planning, and teaching procedures to minimize disruptions.
Downloads
References
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C. (2006). Introduction to research in education (7th ed.). Thompson Wadsworth.
Boone, H. N., Jr., & Boone, D. A. (2007). Problems faced by high school agricultural education teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 48(2), 36–45. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ840104.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2007.02036
Bowen, B., Williams, T., Napoleon, L., Jr., & Marx, A. (2019). Teacher preparedness: A comparison of alternatively and traditionally certified technology and engineering education teachers. Journal of Technology Education, 30(2), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v30i2.a5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v30i2.a.5
Bowling, A. M., & Ball, A. L. (2018). Alternative certification: A solution or an alternative problem? Journal of Agricultural Education, 59(2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2018.02109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2018.02109
California Commission on Teacher Credentialing. (2019). Teacher supply in California, 2017–18: A report to the legislature. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED579161
Carifio, J., & Perla, R. J. (2007). Ten common misunderstandings, misconceptions, persistent myths and urban legends about Likert scales and Likert response formats and their antidotes. Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2007.106.116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2007.106.116
Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Jossey-Bass.
Darling-Hammond, L., Sutcher, L., & Carver-Thomas, D. (2018). Teacher shortages in California: Status, sources, and potential solutions (Getting Down to Facts II). Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/product-files/GDTF_CATeacherShortage_BRIEF.pdf
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Sage.
Foster, D. D., Lawver, R. G., & Smith, A. R. (2020). National Agricultural Education Supply and Demand Study, 2019: Executive summary. https://aaaeonline.org/Resources/Documents/NSD2019Summary.pdf
Guha, R., Hyler, M. E., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2016). The teacher residency: An innovative model for preparing teachers. Learning Policy Institute.
Harrington, L., & Walsh, N. (2020). District support of alternative permit teachers for increasing efficacy and retention. Journal of School Leadership, 36(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020620942508 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020620942508
Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.39.4.0372
Jang, S. T., & Horn, A. S. (2017). The relative effectiveness of traditional and alternative teacher preparation programs: A review of recent research. Midwestern Higher Education Compact, 1–8. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED587431.pdf
National Association of Agricultural Educators. (n.d.-a). NAAE regions. https://www.naae.org/affiliates/regionsIVI/index.cfm
National Center for Education Statistics. (2022). Characteristics of public-school teachers who completed alternative route to certification programs. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/tlc
Redding, C., & Smith, T. M. (2016). Easy in, easy out: Are alternatively certified teachers turning over at increased rates? American Educational Research Journal, 53(4), 1086–1125. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216653206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216653206
Rice, A. (2015). Shaping pedagogical content knowledge for experienced agriculture teachers in the plant sciences: A grounded theory [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Missouri.
Rice, A. H., & Kitchel, T. (2015a). Preservice agricultural education teachers’ experiences in and anticipation of content knowledge preparation. Journal of Agricultural Education, 56(3), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2015.03090 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2015.03090
Rice, A. H., & Kitchel, T. (2015b). The relationship between agriculture knowledge bases for teaching and sources of knowledge. Journal of Agricultural Education, 56(4), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2015.04153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2015.04153
Rice, A. H., & Kitchel, T. (2016). Deconstructing content knowledge: Coping strategies and their underlying influencers for beginning agriculture teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 57(3), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2016.03208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2016.03208
Robinson, J. S., & Edwards, M. C. (2012). Assessing the teacher self-efficacy of agriculture instructors and their early career employment status: A comparison of certification types. Journal of Agricultural Education, 53(1), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2012.01150 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2012.01150
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
Smalley, S., Hainline, M. S., & Sands, K. (2019). School-based agricultural education teachers: Perceived professional development needs associated with teaching, classroom management, and technical agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Education, 60(2), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2019.02085 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2019.02085
Smith, A. R., Lawver, R. G., & Foster, D. D. (2018). Status of the U.S. supply and demand for teachers of agricultural education, 2014–2016. https://aaaeonline.org/Teacher-Supply-and-Demand
Smith, A. R., Lawver, R. G., & Foster, D. D. (2017). National Agricultural Education Supply and Demand Study, 2016: Executive summary. http://aaaeonline.org/Resources/Documents/NSD2016Summary.pdf
Smith, A. R., Lawver, R. G., & Foster, D. D. (2018). National Agricultural Education Supply and Demand Study, 2017: Executive summary. http://aaaeonline.org/Resources/Documents/NSD2017Summary.pdf
Smith, A. R., Lawver, R. G., & Foster, D. D. (2019). National Agricultural Education Supply and Demand Study, 2018: Executive summary. http://aaaeonline.org/Teacher-Supply-and-Demand
Solomonson, J. K., Thieman, E. B., Korte, D. S., & Retallick, M. S. (2019). Why do they leave and where do they go? A qualitative study of Illinois school-based agriculture teachers who left the profession. Journal of Agricultural Education, 60(4), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2019.04115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2019.04115
Sutcher, L., Darling-Hammond, L., & Carver-Thomas, D. (2016). A coming crisis in teaching? Teacher supply, demand, and shortages in the U.S. Learning Policy Institute. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54300/247.242
U.S. Department of Education. (2013). Preparing and credentialing the nation’s teachers: The Secretary’s eighth report on teacher quality. https://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/teachprep/index.html
Walsh, K., & Jacobs, S. (2007). Alternative certification isn’t alternative. Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
Wong, H., & Wong, R. (2014). The classroom management book. Harry K. Wong Publications.