Examining the Implementation of Plant Pathology Curricula in School-Based Agricultural Education: A Pilot Study

James D. Scott; Taylor D. Bird; Eric D. Rubenstein; Brian H. Kvitko

doi:10.5032/jae.v66i3.3035

Authors

James D. Scott Oakland High School https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4807-4378
Taylor D. Bird University of Georgia https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3320-2591
Eric D. Rubenstein University of Georgia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8799-2502
Brian H. Kvitko University of Georgia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9094-4069

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v66i3.3035

Keywords:

Career and Technical Education, Curriculum Development, Science Integration, Teacher Perceptions, Plant Science, Quality Education

Abstract

With increasing emphasis on post-secondary readiness in core subjects such as English, Mathematics, and Science, educators in Career and Technical Education face significant challenges, including declining enrollment and the integration of updated curricula. This study aimed to address these issues within agricultural education by piloting a new plant pathology curriculum designed for secondary School-Based Agricultural Education classrooms. The curriculum, which focuses on the ice nucleator properties of Pseudomonas syringae, aimed to enhance student engagement and critical thinking through an interactive, hands-on laboratory experience. Using a multi-case study research design, three high school agriculture teachers piloted the curriculum, and the study analyzed its effectiveness in promoting student comprehension and laboratory success rates. Data were collected through classroom observations, interviews, and student engagement metrics. Findings highlight the importance of content knowledge for teachers, the challenges in laboratory implementation, and the need for professional development to increase confidence in teaching complex scientific concepts. The study concluded with recommendations for refining curriculum development processes and further research on teacher perceptions and curriculum efficacy in agricultural education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Advance CTE. (2020). Without limits: A shared vision for the future of career technical education. www. careertech.org/without-limits

Agrios, G. N. (2005). Plant pathology (5th ed.). Elsevier Academic Press.

Camp, W. G., & Heath-Camp, B. (2007a). The retention and mentoring of beginning teachers. In R. M. Torres, T. Kitchel, & A. L. Ball (Eds.), Preparing and advancing teachers in agricultural education (pp. 117–129). National Association of Agricultural Educators.

Camp, W. G., & Heath-Camp, B. (2007b). The status of CTE teacher education today. Techniques: Connecting Education and Careers, 82(6), 16–19. http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/EJ775464.pdf

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. SAGE Publications

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

DiBenedetto, C. A. (2015). Teachers’ perceptions of their proficiency and responsibility to teach the knowledge, skill, and dispositions required of high school students to be career ready in the 21st century [Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida]. University of Florida Institutional Repository.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

Lambert, M. D., Velez, J. J., & Elliott, K. M. (2014). What are the teachers’ experiences when implementing the Curriculum for Agricultural Science Education? Journal of Agricultural Education, 55(4), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2014.04100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2014.04100

Marshall, C., Rossman, G. B., & Blanco, G. L. (2022). Designing Qualitative Research (7th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Marshall, T., Bunch, J. C., & Sanders, R. E. (2022). Inquiry-based learning in school-based agricultural education: A content analysis. Journal of Agricultural Education, 63(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2022.02133

Martin, M. J., Fritzsche, J. A., & Ball, A. L. (2006). A Delphi study of teachers’ and professionals’ perceptions regarding the impact of the No Child Left Behind legislation on secondary agricultural education programs. Journal of Agricultural Education, 47(1), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2006.01101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2006.01101

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Mishkind, A. (2014). Overview: State definitions of college and career readiness. College & Career Readiness & Success Center at American Institutes for Research. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED555670.pdf

The National Council for Agricultural Education. (2023). AFNR standards. https://thecouncil.ffa.org/afnr/

Ufnar, J. A., & Shepherd, V. L. (2018). The scientist in the classroom partnership program: an innovative teacher professional development model. Professional Development in Education, 45(1), 642–658. https://doi.org10.1080/19415257.2018.1474487 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1474487

Wang, Z., & Song, G. (2021). Towards an assessment of students’ interdisciplinary competence in middle school science. International Journal of Science Education, 43(5), 693–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1877849 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1877849

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.